“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] What forerunners of disaster such natural signs must seem (exclamation point)! [...]

[...] The idea, of course, is only to integrate the two often opposing points of view, instead of having them in conflict with each other, since, as Seth says, we always have some practical need of Framework 1 activity. [...]

(Moreover, when JA tested me for glaucoma, my eye pressures checked out at 17 for the left and l6 for the right—a point or so better than last time, and midway in the normal range which ends at 25. [...]

[...] (As Seth, Jane pointed to the Christmas amaryllis that sat on the coffee table between us.) It can be encouraged, watched and tended, but it grows as a natural part of the personality. [...]

[...] Point at Sue Mullin [Watkins].)

[...] They are extensions of you from your point of view. [...]

[...] The two of you — for you are both involved — have not only initiated a new framework from which you and others can view the nature of reality more clearly, but you also had to start from scratch, so to speak, to get the material, learn to trust it, and then to apply it to your own lives — even while ‘the facts were not all in yet.’ At no point did you have all of the material to draw upon, as for example, your readers do at any given point. [...]

[...] I’ve discussed some of the same points while introducing earlier books in the series, of course, although on each occasion I did so in a different way for variety’s sake. [...]

[...] In these excerpts Seth also touches upon certain other points that we think of often.

(5:00 p.m. “Don’t be worried — I’m not going to go on with the session, but as he said, you always go back and change the past from the present — your focus point, you know — I know what he’s going to say next …” I said she was welcome to resume the session.

(3:28.) If we are talking about starting over, however, we may as well begin at one of the lowest points and work upward. [...]

[...] She did not want to, however, in our location, and just as I was on the point of suggesting that she end the session, she called a halt to it herself. [...]

[...] For now, I simply want to make the point that in the most basic of terms the human birth is as orderly and spontaneous as the birth of any of nature’s creatures — and a child opens its selfhood even as a flower opens its petals.

You yourself did an excellent job interpreting your own dream, covering all of its main points and meanings. [...]

[...] Her temperature had been taken again after I left — 100.1, or something like that — she said it was down “a few points” from earlier in the day. [...]

[...] She is at this point like a child in the woods, but the potentialities are there for an excellent relationship.

[...] But it shows how far things have gone — that it’s time to back off from the point of death.”

[...] My point is that I am usually aware that such passages are transpiring as I lay quietly; I am not asleep yet some of the material seems to be dreams. [...]

You made rather too much of a point of our location in Wyoming, Joseph. [...]

To cover all points until the situation becomes clearer, I still suggest that neither of you drive with another person. [...]

[...] I have tried to clear up several points for you.

The point about success being a critical factor (in the 367th) also means that it was a potentially creative factor. [...]

[...] He would not hurt himself either beyond a certain point. [...]

(I’m not interested in knocking our technology, however, but in pointing out coexisting inner factors that I’m sure are just as important. [...]

(My own point in all of this is that Jane was different from her contemporaries in more ways than she realized. [...]

[...] They point to mass beliefs that have brought about certain physical conditions that are abhorrent at all levels. [...]

As I wrote this note Jane pointed out that some of my material in Note 1 for the 803rd session is applicable here. [...]