“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The important point here is that identity cohesion is projected upon the human physical structure from within, that is, from the inner ego by way of the inner senses. [...]

[...] I want to make these points to lead up to the main one. [...]

The point of difficulty is your panicky and protective huddling within the core of a limited self, and your fear to set aside the endless doors between self and what seems to be not self, that you yourself have erected.

Give us a moment … You keep searching for a new “ascended master,” or guru, to keep you in line and point out THE WAY — in capitals.

4. See Seth’s very acute discussions of the soul (or entity) in sessions 526–28 for Chapter 6 of Seth Speaks. He came through with many excellent points. [...]

[...] Others represent psychic encounters that happen between two individuals at several points, say, but are not continuous. [...]

[...] I told her I was on the point of taking a nap. [...]

[...] She’d projected a lot of negative feelings upon the doctor, whom she likes, even to the point of tears. [...]

[...] My saying that such a course of bodily harm is pointless is beside the point, when one considers how deeply they have ruled Jane for many years. [...]

Science itself often displays compulsive and ritualistic behavior, to the point of programming its own paths of reasoning, so that they cover safe ground, and steadfastly ignore the great inner forces of spontaneity that make science — or any discipline — possible. [...]

[...] There were two points I wanted to make. [...]

Your sexuality is a point of focus, and that is all. [...]

[...] But because you open a door, this does not mean that you cannot close it, nor does it mean that you cannot have two doors open at once, and this is my point. [...]

[...] At this point I’d been speaking as Seth for about forty minutes, and he recommended a rest period, saying: “Sometime between now and twenty-five years of laying your doubts at rest, I would like to go into some other matters that I have been trying to tackle for several sessions. [...]

(During break, I wondered aloud if she might have selected the book because she intuitively knew Seth was going to discuss its kind tonight — or did Seth use the incident, once it transpired, to make his points in a fresh way? [...]

[...] They are meant to elicit reactions from others and to arrive at new points of understanding, a balance of rights. [...]

[...] When you appeared in form two he was conscious enough, you see, to recognize your arrival, and then to point out to you the dream image which he had already created. [...]

[...] This is not the full account reproduced in this session but a summary containing the main points of the dream.

[...] The main point is indeed the importance of accepting (underlined) a different kind of overall orientation — one that is indeed not any secondary adjunct, but a basic part of human nature. [...]

Creativity itself has its own built-in discipline, the kind that, for example, in a dream can rummage through the days of the future to find precisely the data required to make a specific point.

[...] I’ve organized data with the focus of art in mind as a focus point through which to … perceive the world.

[...] But surely there is a point where feelings themselves are meanings; where the heart’s evidence recognizes intuitively what the intellect must question. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) It represents your physical reference point, your bodily framework. [...]

[...] Other forms of life have almost seemed beside the point, their value considered only insofar as they were of service to man. [...]

I want you to understand the nature of your inner self or, for your friend over here (to Joel Hess) the nature of your soul, for it is a focal point of reality from which other realities spring and not imprisoned in tiny boxes of days or weeks or months, or even of centuries. [...]

[...] You can tune in to certain probabilities and predict “that they will occur,” but free will always operates and no god in giant ivory figures says, this will happen February 15th at 8:05 and if no god predicts, then I do not see the point of doing so myself. [...]

Now: At this point, the god inside became the god outside.

In this chapter I would also like to mention several other pertinent points.

[...] From your point of view these are alternate passageways, but in the dream state they allow you to perceive as physical matter objects that in the waking state would not be observable.

[...] They spread out from the “point of contact,” forming individual lives. [...]

[...] No point of reference for you at all.

[...] So are the wires that we constructed to make our point about fifth dimension, but for all practical purposes we must behave as if the wires are there. [...]

[...] They simply have not chosen the particular experience, nor delved into that moment point.

You are beginning to perceive the holes in the camouflage, for I have pointed them out to you. [...]

[...] We feel that it marks a turning point—yet, paradoxically, we’re not at all sure that we can turn in the right direction! [...]

[...] She showed more animation than I’d seen her display for some time, and I was glad to agree that she made some good points; others I disagreed with. [...]

Jane listened to me go on and on: “I’m on the point again—very close—of refusing to help you with the sessions any longer. [...]

“Another point: Regardless of any seeming contradictions, the beneficial aspects of any particular creative activity far outweigh any disadvantages. [...]