“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I was speaking about feelings directed toward our friend here (Edgar) and I was pointing at you. I was pointing at you and at you (Sue) and at you (Maria). [...]

[...] By integrity, I am speaking of honesty with self that demands you to go beyond the self-deceptions that you accept as your self at any given point. [...]

([Joel:] “Who were you pointing to when you said that somebody over here had something else to work out. [...]

[...] I would like to make one point here, however — that often psychoanalysis is simply a game of hide-and-seek, in which you continue to relinquish responsibility for your actions and reality and assign the basic cause to some area of the psyche, hidden in a dark forest of the past. [...]

[...] The main point I wanted to make in this chapter was that your conscious beliefs are extremely important, and that you are not at the mercy of events or causes that dwell far beneath your awareness.

[...] She pointed off to her upper right as she sat in her rocker. [...]

[...] There: Now I’ve just got another one”— Jane pointed to her lower left — “and it explains all of this.” [...]

I have one small point before we close that I also wanted to mention. You are all remiss in one point here in that you give our Lady of Florence further negative suggestions that reinforce her own distrust of her intuitive self; so let us see that attitude suspended, and I will suspend the session. [...]

[...] If, for example, a point were to be made along these lines, the following could happen— Say that you wanted to express the human characteristics that can lead to disaster, that can lead a man to betray another. [...]

[...] He may even hallucinate such a giant onion but all the time the principle of vitality and power and growth is All That Is, and all of it that you can understand at this point, is within the onion. [...]

[...] Now, I have mentioned this before, but because our Lady of Florence has been so maligned, then I will make this point again. [...]

There is no final state of motion, and it is only because of your present position that it seems to you that there must be such a point. [...]

[...] And do not try, at this point, to intellectually understand the concepts for it will seem contradictory. [...]

[...] In all of this probabilities are involved, so in all points of the past he touched points of probable healings. [...]

There are reasons why he “relapsed,” but the point of power is in the present, and this material and its understanding by Ruburt is more important than “past” causes. [...]

[...] I wrote in the closing note for the session that I was disappointed because Seth hadn’t brought up those two points in the session itself.)

[...] I do, however, want to make the point that your prized psychological norm as a species means that you must also be allowed a great leeway in the use of the imagination and the intellect. [...]

I do not mean to idealize him either, or others of his kind, but to point out that you can use your imaginations and intellects in other fashions than you do. [...]

We are going to have a brief session this evening for several reasons, but there were a few points considering the personality which I did want to make clear.

[...] Unless some adjustments are made at this point, the ego will have nothing to say with the direction that these patterns may take, simply because it will not accept their legitimacy.

As this point is reached the ego obviously becomes more disturbed. [...]

[...] The points I have mentioned are the ones that can literally work miracles in your lives, and they can begin tomorrow. Ruburt should definitely resume the point of power. [...]

[...] She is making her own list of things to do for 1979, including the point of power. [...]

[...] But whatever beliefs you accept, for whatever reasons, your point of power is in the present.

[...] They prefer to leave physical life in a blaze of perception, battling for their lives, at a point of challenge, “fighting” and not acquiescent.

(Pause.) As mentioned earlier in this book, Ruburt and Joseph were both involved in a flood situation (in June, 1972), and so I will use that as a case in point and this specific area in particular, although the flood itself was much more far-reaching.

The area became a psychic and physical focus point of attention, thereby attracting other energy to it. [...]

These constructions cannot be easily pointed to. You can point here–

(Here Jane pointed emphatically at me. [...]

[...] When I said the session was well under way by now, Jane pointed out that her definition of the beginning includes all material given up until and including first break.

[...] It was, he said, perhaps a fifteen-foot cabin-type speedboat, and might have had something in it; on this point Bill was not sure. [...]

[...] There is no point at which you can say in basic terms (underlined twice) that an individual is alive,² though you do find it more practical to accept certain points of life and death. It is true that you emerge into space and time at a certain point in your perception. [...]

[...] For one thing, any focus point of physical life is caused by a merging of probabilities. [...]

[...] Such dates are obviously not just points in time, pinpointed in space. [...]

[...] But as I pointed out, “he” might also be seeing earth’s future,⁹ according to “his” viewpoint. [...]

[...] Ruburt wrote that one did not have to bargain with God for one’s life—an excellent point. One had only to accept one’s life—a second excellent point. [...]

[...] Such a feeling, recognized, can also serve—as it did serve the woman’s mother—as a critical point of recognition that the desire to die was triggered not so much (long pause) by the feeling of life’s completion as by the fact that the individual had set up too many restrictions in life itself—restrictions that were severely cutting back its own possibilities of value fulfillment, or future effective action. [...]

[...] Ruburt is at an excellent point now to use those statements, for they will act as magical learning devices. [...]

[...] She made some good points, but I didn’t agree on others. [...]

Another point: regardless of any seeming contradictions, the beneficial aspects of any particular creative activity far outweigh any disadvantages. [...]

[...] I am trying to make this point as clear as I can to you, because I know it has concerned you both. [...]

[...] In all cases, however, therapeutic benefits “pile up” at other levels, so on occasion only one small trigger here may then release or make effective the very therapeutic benefits that have not shown themselves in practical terms to that point (intently). [...]

[...] I was on the point of asking Seth what one should do when one confronted a fearful result even if one had constructed that result, etc.)

[...] This is an important point, and Ruburt would not have let me speak about it earlier. [...]

The point is that he expects a suggestion to take hold at once, and against countering suggestions that he may have given. [...]

Now you can help by pointing out anything that you notice also. [...]

You think of the table as an amusing diversion and this is not the point. I am glad that it was amusing, but amusement was not the point.

[...] Spontaneous Seth session, following a period of working with the table, in which pressure built up to the point where the table finally broke, working through A A)

We are now embarking upon a new point in your classes and if my friend Ruburt will allow me you shall have at times another teacher for I shall step in now and then to provide my own demonstrations. [...] If any demonstrations occur they will occur only when the moment is right, and they will happen as a side issue to demonstrate certain points which should be made. [...]

It is because you have yourselves reached a certain point in your own development that I speak to you tonight, and when I do so I am between systems. [...]

[...] This is unfortunately one of the main distortions that have come down through the centuries and that is the only point I felt strongly enough that I should interfere with your fine rendition. [...]

[...] On a scale which extends infinitely in both directions the positions of individual points becomes rather meaningless. [...]

[...] There are also some excellent points in that book and I will at some time, in your terms, begin a discussion or a monologue, on the origin of mankind as you know it. [...]

This next may sound Pollyannaish to an extreme, but he should make it a point to help another human being in any small way, without expecting thanks, three times a week. [...] And I also most strongly suggest that three times a week in a very quiet, disciplined but positive manner, he makes it a point to express himself when any matters arise where he holds a diverse opinion from the one being presented.

[...] Jane and I are curious to see if there is any similarity in entity names under such circumstances, and I will make it a point to ask Seth for the name.)

[...] However I did not feel it wise to make a point of telling you because this knowledge in itself would have set up blocks, and on both of your parts.

(At this point I began to sneeze. [...]

We have spoken concerning the relative impossibility of first origins as you consider them, occurring at a particular point in your time. [...]

There are points, quite imaginary, that can be used as references. [...]

[...] There can be no point of origin in time as you conceive it. [...]

[...] This will undoubtedly be difficult to consider, nevertheless there are countless beginnings, even of your own universe, occurring at different reference points in various perspectives; and it is impossible to trace backward your own thin line, since it is interwoven and actually a part of so many others.

[...] I thought that Dr. Instream’s reception would be perfectly fine, and that in this tape Seth, and Jane, had made their points just as they wanted to.

[...] One point first: Doctor Instream is the best man that you could have contacted. [...]