“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] I think my dream is an excellent example of that philosophy; I’d discussed the dream with Jane yesterday, and intended to ask Seth to comment upon it this evening if he didn’t voluntarily do so. [...]

[...] The species could have survived quite well physically without philosophy, the arts, politics, religion, or even structured language. [...]

(This is very good philosophy, and I have been aware of it.)

[...] They seem to be factual only in periods when the goals of a society do not fully include the arts or philosophies in the larger organizational structure of the community.

[...] Seth had barely begun Psyche, for instance, when I suddenly became the psychic recipient of a book on art philosophy and techniques. [...]

Until then the ego and the intuitive self had not come into conflict, as far as basic philosophy was concerned. [...]

Again generally speaking, they are always more at home with ideas, philosophies, and nontangible realities. [...]

(Then we wondered whether Seth had referred to aspects of Christ’s philosophy that were truly buried — quite unknown today. [...]

The animals were also accepted in this natural philosophy of selfhood as the individual plainly saw the living quality of consciousness. [...]

Ruburt’s condition does not just have a physical significance, then, for either of you, but becomes intrinsically tied up with your personal philosophies, your values about creativity and self-reliance. [...]

[...] Ruburt is pragmatic, however, in that he insists upon relating philosophy to daily life—but, again, by providing overall models for behavior, rather than, say, specific detailed method.

[...] I mention this here because many philosophies teach that suicides are met by a sort of special, almost vindictive fate, and such is not the case. [...]

2. Here Seth probably referred to material that Jane and I recently came across concerning the views of a “radical” philosophy of change: Violence is permissible in order to bring about a revolution which, in turn, would lead to a new age. [...]

Give us a moment… There is no civilization, no system of science, art, or philosophy, that did not originate in the mind. [...]

[...] I would like to suggest an experiment and I am suggesting it to you to see your reaction, like I couldn’t. I was really undecided whether to suggest it to Jane or to you, but you see like I’m kind of at an impasse because, like, there are a lot of words and a lot of concepts and philosophies bandied about, but when you make a claim you know such as that in as specific and nonconfusable terms such as that it would be very simple to demonstrate, and what I was wondering is, either now or at some time when Jane would agree to it, for instance, I brought some playing cards with me, ten cards...”)

[...] Yet in sessions, Seth has given Rob excellent advice and information on the techniques and philosophy of art. [...]

[...] We are still accumulating material on art, art philosophy, and painting techniques.

[...] You cannot separate health from philosophy. [...]

Many such philosophies make you cower at the idea of entertaining “negative” thoughts or emotions. [...]

It is not just that such an inner universe is different from your own, but that any real or practical explanation of its reality would require the birth of an entirely new physics—and such a development would first of all necessitate the birth of an entirely new philosophy. [...]

[...] We do know that it’s much easier to condone a philosophy espousing traumatic and repetitive animal research if one is relatively shielded from it.