“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

They may, for example, become aware of their own reincarnational selves, recognizing quite readily personalities they knew in other lives, if those personalities are not otherwise engaged. [...]

[...] Such hallucinations as I have been speaking of, intense symbolistic encounters, can also occur in your sleep states, when the personality is at a time of great change, or when opposing ideas must be unified, or if one must give way to another. [...]

(I personally had one question for Seth. [...]

[...] I felt the force of his momentary anger, I felt personally involved. [...]

Each person responds far more to the environment, that they also create, than is realized. [...]

[...] You are also afraid to move, and both of you are wary of fitting yourselves into a new environment, and in a small but significant way, of making a new personal world.

[...] In this case the personality has to bypass itself as much as possible, and then hope for a clear-enough channel.

[...] Here the generalized fears fostered by religious, scientific, and cultural beliefs are often given as blueprints of diseases in which a person can find a specific focus — the individual can say: “Of course, I feel listless, or panicky, or unsafe since I have such-and-such a disease.”

[...] Your economic well-being is also a part of your personal reality. [...]

[...] Your society is not a thing in itself apart from you, but the result of the individual beliefs of each person in it. [...]

[...] From our records I learned that I’d taken Seth’s quotation from a personal session Jane held while we were on vacation in Marathon, a resort community in the Florida Keys.

[...] And do not forget that the experiences which you encounter will have an effect upon your own personality, as vivid or more vivid than the effect of any waking experience.

(Pause.) The F may refer to a person. [...]

[...] The projected meeting would thus involve four people; the Wilburs could not attend at the last moment, but Don delivered the object personally on April 4, so there was an actual meeting of three.

[...] Marilyn said the G did not refer to any person with that initial that she knew of, in connection with the object. [...]

[...] This will give us a far vaster framework in which to understand the ways in which each individual person fits into the entire picture.

Later we will discuss what this means to you, the individual person, but for now I want to stress the fact that while it may seem natural enough to consider disease as a threat, an adversary or an enemy, this is not the case.

[...] One person was still home upstairs however, as I reminded Jane; the reminder had little effect.

[...] I am personally not much enthused about such informal sessions, although Seth has said at various times that they can be beneficial in ways that regular sessions are not. [...]

[...] Such a tragedy to project upon the living personality.

[...] The man just mentioned denies his personal impulses often. [...]

[...] Ruburt must be himself, fulfilling himself, and those joyful, free, personal and intimate freedoms of his life. [...]

[...] See that session for an explanation of the personal meaning this symbol has for us. [...]

Our last discussion concerning your personal lives helped you both, incidentally. [...]

This correlation between the layers of the subconscious and temperature ranges is true, or rather observable, only when the personality is in an inactive state. [...]

[...] Then from this adjacent platform of A-l consciousness, you perceive the mental thought patterns of yourself or the other person in whatever way you find characteristic of you.

Reincarnational pasts are known to you here, and if some personal malady cannot be solved from A-1, you may have to go to A-2 discovering that it originated from another existence. [...]

[...] Without necessarily following the methods given in A-1, the mental, physical and feeling aspects of past personalities will appear.

Even though I do not give you much time to comment, I still like a give-and-take mood, and the interplay of personalities that you get in this manner. [...]

[...] That is, both of you have pursued separate abilities because of the bent of your particular personalities. [...]

[...] Some things about a personality never change.

[...] She said she felt she had achieved an emotional rapport or contact with the “person,” whom she had never met.)

[...] (Pause.) Your feeling toward oil—you like it because you consider it basic and powerful; and for the same reason you have also not wanted to use it, resenting its personal connotations to you of raw emotion.

[...] There is no personal tie up with the early distrust of fantasy.

[...] I will have more to say as I continue at our next session, with personal material already begun. [...]

[...] The personality therefore is being highly developed.

[...] Some impressions however have their origin within inner reality, and the personality is receiving information not available to the egotistical self. [...]

Then I have a few personal remarks which you may or may not include in the records, as you prefer. [...]

[...] On but two or three occasions in the past we have eliminated personal material from these records. [...]

[...] Incidentally while we are on this subject, often in the past when you thought you were dealing with a matter or a person in a dissociated manner, you were instead exhibiting a cold conscious detachment.

They deal with finer distinctions than you know now, being somewhat of the nature of your body’s ability to sense another person’s aggression. [...]

[...] It may seem, or it did seem, unreasonable to you that personality had much to do with so-called advancement in the artistic world. [...]

[...] But in the lifetime of many artists it must compete with personal vibrations, if you’ll forgive the word, of the artist himself.

[...] My personal opinion at the moment is that we should have taken this step a long time ago. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) Some is difficult to explain clearly, because Ruburt wanted to make sure of the validity of the sessions from the start, and because of other material given in the past, he did not fully accept the sessions or his own psychic abilities as an integral part of his personality—since they appeared relatively late in life, where the poetry, for example, had always more or less been apparent. [...]

[...] So in searching out new ways, personally and creatively, Ruburt felt himself on insecure ground. [...]

Each personality is in a state of his own growth and development, and you cannot impose any standard demands upon such a process, however tempting it is to do so. [...]

[...] The personal decisions all add up to the global happenings on any given day.

Give us a moment … (Long pause, eyes closed.) There are lands of the mind.⁵ That is, the mind has its own “civilizations,” its own personal culture and geography, its own history and inclinations. [...]

(Yet I think more is involved than choosing among the belief systems offered by Eastern or Western cultures, for instance — that is, in more basic terms each personality would make that kind of choice before physical birth, with the full understanding of the vast influence such a decision would have upon a life’s work. [...]

[...] Seth, for example, in the 642nd session in Chapter 11 of Personal Reality: “You will not attain spirituality or even a happy life by denying the wisdom and experience of the flesh. [...]

Social injustices can cause circumstances in which people will give up reason, logic, and personal responsibility to follow a leader who offers them protection from an unsafe universe. [...]

[...] You make your own lessons, so that these mass suicides and murders are an objective culmination, on those peoples’ part, of other, lesser psychological suicides committed on the part of millions who abdicate their personal responsibility in such a way.