“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The inner portions of your personality know the details of your past lives. [...]

[...] However, if a personality believes strongly in the reality of hell, for some time after death he will experience the hallucination of a hell which will be of his own creation.

[...] I am telling you that the origin and ability and power and identity has its origins deep within the personality, and that these origins have little to do with the waking self of which you are all so familiar.

The human personality is free. [...]

[...] The figure is a person you have known who will help you in your own endeavors... [...]

[...] Now this person is an old friend—and I mean old—of mine... [...]

(To Tam:) Personally, your healing abilities are stronger in early evening, as opposed to the rest of the day. [...]

[...] Tam told us that he now does try direct healing on persons he passes on the street—one of the points mentioned by Seth. [...]

[...] Besides the person of whom you are aware, there are also other guises taken by the same personality, and he has appeared in your dreams before you were aware of him objectively. [...]

[...] Now, there are symbols that are personal but there are also symbols that are, in your terms, universal and you build with these. [...]

[...] Now, you are familiar with morality plays so in our story we take the term deceit and we give it a name and we make a person out of deceit and we call it, for example, Judas. [...]

Within your own personality all facets of your consciousness converge, whether or not you are aware of it.

(Jane’s question arose out of material in the 560th session in Chapter Fourteen: She wanted to know the name of the third personality making up the three-part Christ entity that Seth has postulated. [...]

[...] You will learn that certain symbols will appear personally to you at various stages of consciousness, and these can serve as points of recognition in your own explorations. [...]

[...] One person may symbolize fear as a demon, as an unfriendly animal, or even as some perfectly simple ordinarily harmless object; but if you know what your own symbols mean, then you can use the knowledge not only to interpret your dreams but also as signposts to the state of consciousness in which they usually occur.

(Before, she had noticed this sensation only during, or before sessions in which Seth’s larger personality spoke. [...]

[...] The other can indeed telepathically help change the inner climate by inserting ideas of confidence and strength, and thus changing the psychic climate enough so that the ailing personality can then do more on their own behalf.

[...] Do this as if you were starting out to paint a picture, requesting to see the images of certain persons at a given time or situation in the future, and let your abilities then fill in on the imaginative pattern. [...]

[...] If you are looking for a refreshing change, a lighthearted experiment, then imagine what painting you would paint if you were a particular other person, gifted with your own abilities.

[...] Seth said that on occasion suggestion will reach all levels of the personality, that our voice will be heard throughout the personality, and that effective action will follow. [...]

[...] I am certain that Ruburt could so organize the center portion of the book so that stress could still be given to the personal story line.

[...] In any well-balanced personality these operate automatically, as in Ruburt’s case.

[...] Jane said she had the personal association of Norway when she heard herself giving the data on ice, regarding the name.

[...] The break after 1st half hour served to encourage me, personally, that data was okay—before I continued. [...]

3. A. Why do we attract the kind of visitors we do, in person?

(10:20.) I want to make it plain that such ideas are rampant in society, and are at the basis of many personal and national problems. [...]

[...] Much of this is involved with the unfortunate myths about this creative person, who is not supposed to be able to deal with the world as well as others, whose idiosyncrasies are exaggerated, and whose very creativity, it is sometimes said, leads to suicide or destruction. [...]

[...] You’re very close-mouthed: you don’t blab our personal business, as you put it, but you’d do that.... [...]

[...] Personality gestalts within this field are built up electrically, with electric components, without physical matter. [...] Your own personalities in some manners exist within this field.

This field projects itself, as should be obvious, into your own field of actuality, and as such the personality itself has its existence in both fields; and both systems, being open, are dependent one upon the other, and a failure to survive in one system threatens survival in the other. [...]

The nonphysical systems are frightening to the ego-centered personality; but the bulk of the individual’s reality does not lie within the physical universe, but in those unknown areas. [...] Were it not for past existences the personality as you know it would not exist.

[...] The intuitive portions of the personality are not so formed, and these will operate to your advantage in any inner exploration. [...]

[...] Many of these have been derogatory; we now plan to ask Tam for the names of the individual board members, and we want to learn how to write to them to be sure they personally receive our messages. [...]

[...] I personally resent a great deal the poor connotations that now have attached themselves to Mass Events; if the material has any validity, this has happened, and would be picked up by readers, even if counterbalanced by other good feelings. [...]

[...] The main thing, again, is that Ruburt’s personal trust in the body be reinforced by himself through such reminders, and by your own reassurance. [...]

[...] The natural person—the creator, the artist—in Ruburt, wants the book out without any interruptions, and cares little about other issues. The socially knowledgeable person does not want to be taken for a fool, be insulted, and wants to be treated with respect. [...]

[...] No one is seriously concerned about the possibility of a person dying of a disease because they followed any of the advice given in the book. [...]

(8:54.) The intellect, then, helps your species translate its own natural purposes and intents — the purposes and intents of the natural person — into their “proper” cultural context, so that those abilities the natural person possesses can benefit the civilization of its time. [...]

[...] (Pause.) Your own relationship, your private beliefs about the sort of persons you wanted individually for mates, brought about incalculable actions that led finally to your meeting — yet it all happened “quite naturally,” of course. [...]

[...] And your physical environments, your personal physical environments, are the results of your inner materialized thoughts. [...]

([Seth II:]) You do not understand multidimensional personality structures. [...]

[...] And the inner self of each personality cooperates to maintain the physical world that you know. [...]

Personally then he took upon himself what you would say perhaps were great problems—too great for the personality to handle, but his inner tendencies for self-mutilation always kept his vision true to his main image of the world.

Van Gogh, for your information, was (underlined) obsessed personally with ideas of self-mutilation, and underwent great inner torture. [...]

That reinforcement will add to the personal power of all other individuals with whom those people come in contact. [...]

(10:10.) Personal grudges would not build up, so that men or women so fear further hurts that they attempt to hide from life or relationships, or shy away from contact with others. [...]

[...] The source of the psyche’s strength is within each individual, the invisible fabric of the person’s existence.

[...] I still want to study all of those early personal sessions, but haven’t progressed far because of all the new material we’ve been getting lately. [...]

You two have largely worked alone, and your work goals involve of course the development of personality characteristics that must apply to artistic work. [...]

[...] The person involved may indeed have difficulty artistically in expression, and an artistic revulsion can then be quite acceptable, but not a moral one.

[...] A disordered personality, quite legitimate psychic abilities, however, fairly well developed. [...]

[...] He knows of me, he is not aware of all the levels of his own identity or personality. [...]

[...] The use of a normal vocabulary would put the ideas within the reach of the ordinary person as much as possible. [...]

[...] I’d say that her own awareness of multiple channels has grown out of her initial sensing of the channels available from Seth, as described in the 616th session in Chapter 2 of Personal Reality; and that her material on neurological speeds is related to the observations of Jane that were noted by Sue Watkins in Seth Speaks; see the 594th session in the Appendix of that book. [...]