“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The material given earlier for this personality still applies. [...]

[...] I stressed that it was a very important step, and that maybe soon I could take apart Personal Reality, as I had suggested doing some weeks ago, so that she could read it page by page. [...]

Now more personally our friend, the Jesuit. [...]

This was still however you see quite selfish, in that you are the person he wants. [...]

[...] Her work was unique in that it was coming through her individual personality, I added — yet, why wasn’t the theory of probabilities, or its equivalent, say, common knowledge, or at least considered, in psychology today? [...]

[...] Then, after it became obvious that the Seth sessions were going to continue, we kept constant check on my personality characteristics and went to a psychologist — as any sane, red-blooded American would do under such circumstances in those days. [...] Besides, my personality showed no adverse signs of instability. [...]

[...] She said she wasn’t worried about the results of the experiments, and that nothing she said about them had any personal meaning to her at all.

[...] He is a friend; visiting us over the Christmas holidays, he urged Jane and me not to wait too long before making personal inquiries at the bureau, to check and see if they had received my application. [...]

[...] At least then they could say they had an occult personality who played the new part. [...]

The healthy man or woman, in excellent condition, may be quite as blind in other areas, but the healer and the patient are united in a strange fashion by their belief in the existence of dis-ease as far as personal experience is concerned. [...]

[...] But the pressures of work, plus our own conservative attitudes about personal publicity, have led us to pass by other such opportunities.

[...] [We hardly ever talk about whatever personal involvement either of us might have had with reincarnation, incidentally, regardless of whether any such lives would be based upon Seth’s ideas of simultaneous time and probabilities, or upon time as a series of successive moments.] Jane did know that the rest of the session would be for her, though. [...]

[...] Naturally, what I did see is my personal reconstruction from the data furnished by Seth.

I am speaking generally here, for remember that your individual beliefs, thoughts, and emotions cause your reality, so no person dies ahead of his or her time. [...]

Now, more personally, our friend the Jesuit. [...]

Animals can be obedient to their masters, and be healthy and exuberant at the same time, but in the terms of nature, no matter what social customs might say, no person can be obedient to a master and be healthy and exuberant at the same time. [...]

[...] And the purpose in that point was to let you see that the human individual reaction of a given personality continues. [...]

[...] Now you should realize that this endeavor is indeed a highly creative one, for you have here at the least, at the very least, two personalities, my own and Ruburt’s, and we dwell entirely (in) different dimensions. [...]

And we will have book dictation Wednesday, with any personal material at the end.

[...] As I mentioned earlier (in Session 821), each person caught in either an epidemic or a natural disaster will have private reasons for choosing those circumstances. [...]

[...] I thought her work was better than ever, surprisingly so, and that her ideas were good and her extremely personal handling of them in paint very fresh. [...]

[...] It will be up to you to use your inner knowledge, your intuitions, in determining which persons to refuse and which to accept.

[...] It was known that only by presenting the material in writing, and eventually in books, that his personality would accept it. [...]

Ruburt had to understand his own creative necessities as a person, and accept the mobility of his own consciousness and those changes that it would involve. [...]

[...] That organism is intimately connected to the natural biological state of each other person, and to each other living thing, or entity, however minute.

[...] Often in such cases these are “fragment personalities,” wanting to taste physical reality, but not being ready to deal with it. [...]