“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Nations, like individuals, can have split personalities at times. [...]

[...] Individuals — or races — did not have to take certain specific roles, acting out various portions of humanity’s characteristics; each person was allowed to be unique, with all that that implies.

[...] You were born with a faith in your existence that automatically directed the proper functioning of your personal corporeal self. [...]

Many additional issues operate, however, that have to do with any given personal reaction. [...]

[...] This energy, the use of it, is a natural ability that is part of his personality, and he must use it. [...]

Through personal interests and background this is done through his work. [...]

[...] Some of that framework material is personal, but much more of it is general.

[...] Jane had also expressed a strong desire for some personal information in the session.)

Each person’s personal reality has the same kind of unity. [...]

[...] And with a group show of some note in 1935, in which I believe this person participated, who now owns, or runs, or is connected with this gallery in this neighborhood.

It should also include some other reproductions of your paintings as they apply to your psychic personalities. [...]

[...] The personality, therefore, has gone along well, and the process has been very slow. [...]

(To Davey.) Now here we have a too early blooming of abilities before the overall personality was able to handle them, and we also have a great contrast in attitude for we have on one hand the determination to show up all fraud, and on the other hand, the fear underneath that our own experiences could somehow be fraudulent. [...]

At birth, each person is automatically equipped with the capacity toward natural growth that will most completely satisfy its own abilities — not at the expense of others, but in an overall context in which the fulfillment of each individual assures the fulfillment of each other individual.

[...] The psychological connections, however, are far more complicated, so that each individual’s dreams and thoughts interweave with every other person’s, forming ever-changing patterns of desire and intent. [...]

The dreams are providing him with excellent personal inner experience, telling him of his progress. [...]

[...] It would be difficult to carry the memories of the present ego personality with you. [...]

[...] It is used now and then to acquaint the whole personality with those circumstances that shall at one time affect it.

[...] Also Jane and I have been personally invited by the three new proprietors, whom we know, to continue doing business with the Art Shop. [...]

[...] He has explained that this is easier, usually, than focusing so sharply on the one physical and psychic personality in our temporal now.

[...] Cellular consciousness is usually considered as simply a repository for past knowledge having to do with personal or racial existence. [...]

[...] Our purpose in conducting these experiments in this manner is to see what Jane, or Seth, can pick up about a concealed object that bears some kind of emotional charge related to us personally. [...]

(However, Seth has done as well with objects quite separated from the personal emotional life of Jane and mine. [...]

[...] But also, negative, meaning pictures, is called to mind because Wendell’s letter deals with a group of artists who worked together in a studio, drawing comic strips, in 1941-3. In addition I personally have a studio here in the apartment, and the envelope used as object was kept in this studio. [...]

[...] It was Jane’s initial contact with the Frank Watts personality, through the Ouija board, that led to these sessions. F. Watts has been dead perhaps twenty years, and is one of the personalities making up the Seth entity.

You of all people should realize that when valid concern for world problems turns into an obsession with world injustices that wipes out all, or threatens to wipe out all personal enjoyment, then trouble is on the way. [...]

The book will yield a tremendous amount of psychological knowledge, for little if at all has been done to explain the subjective personality ...

This is not only personal. [...]

[...] When through Ruburt’s open eyes I observe you, I observe more than the person that you realize that you are, for it is difficult for me to pinpoint you in your time. [...]

[...] If he has not, he has been personally suspicious but did not consider the man that important, though the term is relative.

You should personally study more concerning the medical end. [...]

Now my friend Ruburt will not like this, and will object on general principles, but I am speaking on personalities and not necessarily on sexes. [...]

She told Ruburt that she felt herself to be an inferior person, unable to cope, an individual who was not able to hold her own with her co-workers or the world at large.

A person may seem to be very open and responsive. [...]

First of all, some personal comments.

Our next session will be concerned with the discussion which we earlier began, rather than with personal concerns. [...]

As Seth I’ve produced five previous books: Seth Speaks; The Nature of Personal Reality; The “Unknown” Reality, Volumes I and II; The Nature of the Psyche; and The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events, and Seth is halfway through a sixth book: Dreams, “Evolution,” and Value Fulfillment. [...]

[...] But I thought there would be things in each person’s life that could be used as guideposts, to a magical kind of orientation. [...]

A personal session.

Each person’s nature, however, innately possesses all of the qualities and characteristics necessary to bring about its own fulfillment. [...]

(This rather humorous material from Seth was in reference to a talk Jane and I had, at my instigation, several days ago, when I idly speculated about asking Scott Meredith to personally represent us. [...]

[...] There is nothing at all wrong with wanting, say, to become a millionaire, but if you simply concentrate upon the creative, personal elements in your lives—your writing in the notes, your painting, Ruburt’s writing and psychic freedom, then everything else will fall into place. [...]

[...] We want to have at least a session a week on personal matters, and two or three meetings a week for work on beliefs. [...]

He would purposely choose occasions in which dancing, to begin with, was at least not the thing—when no one else was dancing, when an ordinary person might have inhibitions against it. [...]