“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The balance of nature upon your planet is no chance occurrence, but the result of constant, instant computations on the part of each most minute consciousness, whether it forms part of a rock, a person, an animal, a plant. [...]

[...] (To me:) You are personally inhibiting your dream recall because you do not want to take the time to remember and interpret the dreams. [...]

You personally expressed feelings that both of you had had, and then both of you were appalled by the feelings and used them as springboards. [...]

[...] Neither concept has anything to do with the basic merit of a personality.

[...] Oftentimes such remarks and actions are the result of the other person’s own ignorance, and actually not directed at you personally.

[...] Personally, I would like our next move to be to our own place in the suburbs or the nearby country.

[...] I am pleased over your portrait prize, Joseph, because the prize should make you aware of the fact that good work is recognized, and that despite the personal and unfortunate shortcomings of individuals as a whole they still do recognize good work, and you should give them credit for this.

[...] Everyone knows in which social level each other person belongs. [...]

[...] Now that idea is no more ludicrous than the idea you have, for both attempt to prove personal merit through the manipulation of money and status. [...]

[...] “I know that in those earlier sessions Seth said I equated the left side with the unconscious portions of the personality and the masculine role in society [see the deleted sessions for April 4 and 16, 1979], but—”

[...] I picked the card for tonight’s session because I thought it would be loaded with strong emotional charges of a personal nature, whereas the identification card used in the last test belonged to a person almost unknown to Jane and me.

[...] The gasoline station was Ruburt’s personal association derived from this, subconsciously.

Now this is indeed a personal seminar that you attend, and in the terms used by Bernard. I am speaking to you from a particular point of my personality, the part which you can easily understand. [...]

[...] You recognize my personality as it is presented to you. [...]

[...] Such characteristics are, however, basic properties of the natural person. [...]

It understands, for example, that clairvoyant material is a part of the personality’s overall characteristics, so it is not afraid of perceiving it — and it is able to separate such information confusion from present physical sense perception. [...]

[...] This is partially the result of old ideas, where sleep is a separate, isolated part of life, or of the personality.

[...] It becomes, relatively now, opaque to subjective personal conditions, since it has no secure exterior framework against which the inner condition can be judged. [...]

[...] I remarked about the opinions of others when they read our deleted material after our deaths, for instance, whereupon Jane said that more than once she’d had the idea of destroying all our personal material when we were older.

[...] To some extent or another each person feels at odds with the cultural environment, or worse, with their most intimate companions. [...]

(We did not know which personality would speak this evening, nor what subjects would be covered. [...]

[...] I did not really mean to use the word permission, meaning instead whether there had to be any sort of understanding or agreement between the two personalities as to who would hold the session, or at least begin it. [...]

[...] (Leaning forward, eyes wide.) Say you as a personality can write and paint. [...]

[...] When you read the reincarnational information, (about the Roman captain on September 12, 1977), it triggered the Nebene material because of your own personal situation at the time—your mood, and so forth (on September 20, 1977). [...]

[...] Now when either of us picks up the telephone we’re prepared to talk to a person from any part of the country. [...]

Personalities within, that are not dominant within the ego, are dominant within other fields of actuality, though they appear as mere shadowy influences within your own.

[...] But again, as you cannot hold your own breath, so you cannot hold that which is even more intimate, and which forms the very personality which attempts the examination.

[...] Am I an independent personality, who has indeed survived not one but many deaths? [...]

I recognize the difficulties, for example, that you encounter quite personally as you struggle with Ruburt’s physical condition, or those you experience, say, watching television news as you see spread before your vision unfortunate events that seem to portray most clearly evidence of man’s flawed nature. [...]

[...] Ruburt’s dreams have been helping him identify his own personal experience as he interpreted such beliefs in early life. [...]

[...] The main issue, again, is to reassure that one important portion of Ruburt’s personality that the self is not sinful, not bad or evil, and to show it the limited nature of the framework that so defined it. [...]

[...] An apparition constructed as a result of telepathic data, picked up by the perceiver in message form, will be constructed by him in precisely the same manner that an apparition will be constructed that is a reflection of a survival personality.

[...] That is, dreams that are shared at one time or another by the majority of living persons on your planet.

[...] In that regard, every person paints his or her own portrait in living color — a portrait that does not simply sit in a tranquil pose at a table, but one that has the full capacity for action. [...]

[...] In a manner of speaking, now, each person dips into the same supplies of paint, and so forth — which are the elements out of which your likenesses emerge. [...]

If you remember that beneath all, each unit of consciousness is aware of the position of each other unit, and that these units form all physical matter, then perhaps you can intuitively follow what I mean, for whatever knowledge man attains, whatever experience any one person accumulates, whatever arts or sciences you produce, all such information is instantly perceived at other levels of activity by each of the other units of consciousness that compose physical reality—whether those units form the shape of a rock, a raindrop, an apple, a cat, a frog or a shoe. [...]

[...] Again, I could choose another term, but I want to emphasize each person’s intimate contact with that other reality that does occur in what you think of as the state of dreaming (all very intently).

[...] During it Joanie enthusiastically verified that she has the odd habit of eating lettuce, a head at a time, as another person might eat candy or pretzels. [...]

[...] The writing represents strong portions of Frank’s personality that are intently concerned with the expression of subjective feelings—feelings that appear nebulous at times because they cannot be expressed—so it seems to him—in a direct fashion.

When you are dealing with dream locations you are not dealing with mass-perceptions, but with personal perceptions. There is no need therefore for any complicated arrangements calculated to insure agreement between persons as to location in space.

[...] But as a rule they are personal actualities, without a general (underline general) mass framework. [...]