“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] I even meant ourselves. [...] “The only thing that’s going to save us is ourselves,” I said, and reminded Jane to never forget this little episode. [...]

[...] “No, if we could do all that, we’d know when we were going to die!” But suppose we saw beyond the point of death, discovering to our surprise that we were still conscious—not only of ourselves as we “were” but of other portions of ourselves of which we had been unaware? [...]

[...] In sticking so close to the confines of egotistical physically oriented awareness, we may be closing ourselves off from answers to our deepest questions, knowledge that can help us deal more intelligently with physical life.

[...] It is not used by more advanced entities nor by less developed ones than ourselves. [...]

[...] Already I was wondering whether we should ask questions we thought others were interested in, or just those we spontaneously came up with ourselves.

[...] I’ll describe the latest of the many courses of action we’ve found ourselves considering over the years as we work with the Seth material, while trying to keep a balance between the realities we’ve created for ourselves and the possibilities we constantly encounter in the “outside” world.

[...] As was characteristic of us, also, we worked by ourselves for a long time as we attempted to learn more about what we were doing. [...]

“If we really understand how dreams worked and allowed ourselves to explore dream levels, we’d see how the universe is formed. [...]

[...] We had to give ourselves hope in that fashion....” [...]

[...] In 330 later, I left Jane to visit Medical Records again, but got nowhere because I missed seeing Janet Troutt, who’s getting Jane’s records for both ourselves and Blue Cross. [...]

(This morning I wrote Maude Cardwell a short letter, promising more later, both from ourselves and via our lawyer. [...]

In this book, therefore, we will devote ourselves to ways of promoting health, and we will purposely avoid the specific naming of “dis-eases”. [...]

[...] And that this particular journey of consciousness, we are leaving ourselves completely open to experience to whatever happens without making any demands or suggestions. [...]

([Joel:] “I am wondering if as we continue to get ourselves into the emotional level if we will experience less distortion at the communicational level, or if rather dealing extensively at the communicational level, if we will be able to communicate intuitively or telepathically?”)

(During break a discussion of anger, both to our children and to ourselves.)

[...] Also there for the asking was more material about ourselves, but….)

([Gene]: “And would it not be true to say that we are all running the same seminar for ourselves since we are all one?”)

([Gene]: “Can we teach ourselves to be guided by that larger self?)

([Joel:] “And those you don’t have we’ll have to find ourselves, and when we find them ourselves you can give them to us.”)

(The night before this session was held Jane suggested that each day we read over a session, or talk or review some notes, as a way to give ourselves a “pep talk” and to lead us into the day. [...]

[...] I typed half of it Tuesday night; but Tuesday morning, in keeping with our idea to ground ourselves in new ideas each day, I read the full session to her from my notes.

[...] We’re telling ourselves that that little challenge will automatically work itself out at the right time. [...]

[...] We’ve been reminded anew—more accurately, we’ve taught ourselves—that physical life itself is a wondrous medium of expression, and terrifically varied in that respect.

It seems that once again we must learn the hard way that in Jane’s case any improvements we achieve are going to come from within ourselves (for I’m certainly as involved in and “responsible” for her illnesses as she is). [...]

[...] After the session I told Jane that he’d said more than he realized — that in the case of predictions it would be wise of us to remind ourselves that his sense of time is indeed far different than ours, that much more time could be involved on our parts than on his. [...]

[...] What we know of identity represents fragments and splinters that we call ourselves. [...]

[...] We found ourselves doing so, however; we also found ourselves driving past the house we’d considered buying there last year. [...]

(Then in Sayre, Pennsylvania, this afternoon [Monday the 17th], we found ourselves participating in house-related developments that took us back in time more than nine months.⁹ Jane and I don’t believe in coincidences. [...]

[...] I told Jane that, once heard, much of Seth’s material had the quality of being so obvious that we in turn seemed to be quite opaque not to have reached the same conclusions ourselves. [...]