“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This gray-brown leaf had been taped to the shade on my lamp at work for well over a year; originally I had used it as a model in doing some artwork for a Christmas card. [...]

[...] She had maintained her original position—eyes closed, head resting on her left upraised hand, for the whole delivery. [...]

[...] I thought another group of them tried to get at the origin of the envelope object—namely my place of employment—hence the reason I chose the question I asked. [...]

[...] Within your system, to kill is obviously a moral crime, but to kill another in punishment only compounds the original error. [...] The original meaning of that remark, however, should be understood. [...]

Now: If, for example, you hate a parent, then it becomes quite easy to hate any parents, for in their faces you see and project the original offender. [...]

[...] Yet the self limits itself through boundaries that are arbitrary and erected through fear, and also through habit that originally had its source in the necessity for physical survival. [...]

[...] It is true that these constructions take place on a subconscious level, but to the degree that you realize what you are doing, they will become more comprehensible to the intellect, until full awareness of the origin of physical matter would be reached.

[...] On an unconscious level however the self is very aware of the progress of these secondary personalities, and indeed uses this plane itself for the fulfillment and development of qualities originally attached to it, but incompatible with its main intents. [...]

[...] Consider art as a natural phenomena constructed by the psyche, a trans-species of perception and consciousness that changes, enlarges and expands life’s experiences and casts them in a different light, offering new opportunities for creating action and new solutions to problems by inserting new, original data. [...]

With that understood, my material comes from beyond Framework 2. Creative material in general, however, has its origin in Framework 2, and when it is perceived in Framework 1, to some extent or another it connects the perceiver to that other source. [...]

(I feel more hopeful today; and almost as if there might be something from the libvary on the principles of conservatism and originality as in the Cézanne book. [...]

(Now the noise in the fireplace was fluctuating.) There you run into problems involved with Catholic or Christian devotion, the natural feedback needed in the development of creative work, and the striking originality of creative ventures that strike out on their own, forming their own paths. [...]

(Pause.) The creative self is made to feel guilty for its own originality and productivity. [...]

[...] Many of those fears originated long before the sessions, of course, and before he realized that there was any alternative at all between, say, conventional religious beliefs and complete disbelief in any nature of divinity. [...]

In the time those fears originated, he shared the belief framework of Christianity, so that he believed that outside of that framework there could indeed be nothing but chaos, or the conventional atheism of science, in which the universe was at the mercy of meaningless mechanistic laws—laws, however, that operated without logic, but more importantly laws that operated without feeling. [...]

[...] We were originally a portion of the same entity. [...]

[...] Instead you have formed the event, not realizing that it had its origins at the time you slept. [...]

[...] You are like a living language spoken by someone who did not originate it — the language was there for you to use. [...]

[...] Languages also have accents, each somewhat different while still maintaining the original integrity of any given language. [...]

[...] The lines in the palm, indicated by black lines, are in actuality in white on the original print, so that the effect is the interesting one of a hand in reverse, or perhaps a map or plan printed in reverse. [...]

But the dreaming state presents any experimenter with original and varied material, and the opportunities involved are tremendous. [...]

[...] The original print used as the object, with the white lines apparent, is a diagram. [...]

[...] Other so-called psychic books of current nature are reported also, but usually by someone even further removed from the original experiences. [...]

[...] It was Tam who saw in Ruburt’s original manuscript the importance of his work, and the way in which Ruburt was trying to hide it by playing down his relationship with me.

[...] The original reasons behind the condition have largely been taken care of, but he is left with physical beliefs about his body. [...]

[...] The author explains the various theories for the origin of our observable universe of planets, galaxies, quasars, and so forth, presenting the evidence for and against each theory. Yet when the question arises as to what prevailed before the advent of our universe (or of whether it has existed “forever”), we are told that science doesn’t deal with ultimate origins and endings; we are referred to the realms of theology and/or philosophy for whatever answers are available.

[...] There were those who understood the “origin” of your solar system far better than you. [...]

[...] Through you they become a part of the experience of the greater identity, but its reality also “originally” gave you your physical existence, as you gave your children physical life. [...] Yet they did not originate from the womb either, but from the seed and the egg.

[...] She may revise her copy somewhat before it appears in Politics, but I prefer to quote from her original notes:

[...] You were interested not only in a painting, and the painting’s origin, but in your origin as an artist, and in all of those relationships that are involved between the perceiver and the object, that then is turned into the artist’s model. [...]

Now: Again, master events are those that most significantly affect your system of reality, even though the original action was not physical but took place in the inner dimension. [...]

[...] As the origin of your world did indeed emerge from the “world of dreams,” so the true root of all events lie in such subjective activities, and the answers to individual challenges and problems [...]

[...] The condition originated in an infection of the intestine. [...]

[...] This one will be kept later, not at the original specified time. [...]

[...]  Discussion of the origins of Heaven and Hell followed.)

[...] I was originally called Protonius. [...]

[...] Any intense mental act — thought or emotion — will not only be constructed in some physical or pseudophysical manner, but will also bear to some extent the imprint of the personality who originally conceived it.

[...] Your emotional intensity and focus create forms beside your physical body, however their duration and degree are dependent upon the intensity of any given emotional origin.

[...] If I told you that God was an idea, you would not understand what I meant, for you do not understand the dimensions in which an idea has its reality, or the energy that it can originate and propel. [...]

[...] It was created as a result of that need, grew out of it, but it did not originate within your system of reality.