“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] (Long pause.) Whenever the ego gains overcontrol, or sets itself up to oppose deep and basic action within the whole personality, then in doing so it also blocks to some considerable extent the passage or use of the whole personality’s vital energy.

These mentioned beliefs are obvious enough when I tell you of them, but their opposing natures gave confusing data to the body consciousness: Write and do not write.

[...] (Originally Luke composed his Gospel and Acts as one treatise; the two were separated early in the second century.) Out of such contradictions as those implied in Luke’s case, however, confusion and opposing opinions reign when one studies the Gospels and related material. [...]

It is the present personality’s desire to express himself, opposed by the subconscious memories of that past life, with its fear of the effects of eloquence used without discretion, that now cause his difficulty.

Give us a moment … The particular thrust and direction of your own science have been directly opposed to the development of such inner sciences, however, so that to some extent each step in the one direction has thus far taken you further from the other. [...]

[...] Symbolically in your case, and opposed to our Jesuit’s case, the retention of fluids has to do with the fear for your position, of refusal to give up, or the fear of giving up, prerogatives. [...]

You were aware incidentally of your own misinterpretation, and the appearance of your father in both the dreams was opposed by the female vessel symbol, as the opposition between both parents has been an important element in your subconscious life.

[...] In many ways he and Mark have opposing personalities, and yet basically the entities are similar to some startling degree.

When the inner ego and the outer ego pursue directly opposed viewpoints and different aims and goals, then you run into difficulty. [...]

[...] A rigid, dogmatic concept of good and evil will force you to perceive physical existence as a battleground of opposing forces, with the poor unwary soul almost as a buffer. [...]

[...] The mind as opposed to the brain, perceives time in terms of the spacious present. [...]

[...] The bridge here involves the natural world, his love of nature, the connections between poetry, strolling the natural world as opposed to the social one.

“The purpose is, quite simply, being as opposed to nonbeing. [...]

[...] Realization of these causes creates an opposing force that can neutralize the original. [...]

[...] Lumber usually being straight as opposed to crooked.

[...] They concerned the opposing uses of personal power by two individuals whom we’d encountered within the last week: the woman lawyer who had interrupted the session last Wednesday evening, and who is so afraid of her power; and the young classical guitarist who had visited us last night, and who revels in the positive use of his power. [...]

[...] New concepts were thought of as intuitional or psychic, as opposed to the conventional duties of the intellect, so the two seemed separate. [...]

[...] In his case also, as given in the past, he felt that the feminine qualities were those opposed to intellectual development. [...]

[...] But we must struggle to discover what these are as opposed to the hallucinatory images we set up ourselves against or superimposed upon this reality.

[...] The mind, as opposed to the brain, perceives in terms of a spacious present. [...]