Results 341 to 353 of 353 for (stemmed:negat AND stemmed:conscious)
Science has seen man as an accidental product of an uncaring universe, a creature literally without a center of meaning, where consciousness was the result of a physical mechanism that only happened to come into existence, and that had no reality outside of that structure. [...]
[...] On the other hand of course Ruburt also expected you to come up with and initiate the noncontact behavior when he felt that your relationship was getting too close for comfort, that his physical love for you might lead him some time to neglect consciously or unconsciously proper contraceptive behavior.
[...] There is also, in this same respect, an organizational aspect to your personality that is not now being used to advantage, and therefore can have negative consequences. [...]
[...] Whether or not you are consciously aware of this, in your earlier life, when you became extremely nervous or upset or had a bad problem, you began to “shut down” stimuli. [...]
But you must give yourself some relaxation from the constant concentration upon negative aspects.
Too-conscious an attempt will not help, but this material should help. [...]
[...] If one were to set out consciously determined to go walking for a period of two hours, twice a week without fail, he might approximate somewhat what is involved. [...]
(Before giving me the shot in his office, the doctor gave me a skin test for sensitivity, which proved negative. [...]
We are going about this explanation in our own way; Ruburt and I have a pact, now, of which he is not consciously aware, and if I observe certain niceties or conventions, which I am perfectly willing to accept, then he lets me through. [...]
[...] You will see here that indirectly but clearly we have given you the identity of the person whose death is foreseen, particularly when I add to the positive statement, though it may appear negative, that your mother, Joseph, is in no way involved.
[...] She was fully aware that that quality became much more obvious in her class singing and sessions, but she didn’t have to consciously evoke it—the drama was just there. [...]
[...] We never do, yet I said things that later I wished I hadn’t. Such regrets are inevitable, I suppose, but if I can tell my wife about the storms of consciousness that I think are so active in the Middle East, for example, then certainly I feel like discussing my feelings about our own challenges. [...]
“What I think about illness,” I said, “is that as a people we know so little about it consciously that we’re still literally in the dark ages in that respect. [...]
[...] Evidently, she said, both of us are still consciously unsure of what our challenges and fears are on certain levels. [...]
[...] This is not to negate your own quite personal involvement, but only to show that other strong issues also help make that involvement possible.
[...] To some extent your own quite natural hesitations and fears and conscious ideas still limit the full and comprehensive nature of the material that you could be receiving.
[...] I hadn’t thought his death could bother me that much, for certainly I hadn’t dwelled upon it consciously at all.
[...] We found the workings of our national consciousness to be both mightily creative and terribly frustrating in numerous ways. [...]
[...] It’s always this way—you know, the collective expression of our national consciousness—uh, cooperating in whatever way with Iran’s, and with that of every other country on earth….”
[...] Early in February she wrote an essay on Seth as a “master event.”4 That piece was inspired by her material in an old journal; Jane elaborated upon it in an effort to fit events from our own lives into our national consciousness. [...]
[...] We watched television replays of the shooting over and over again during the rest of the afternoon and into the evening, as for the second time within a generation the overall consciousness of the United States struggled, through our leaders, to meet one of the great challenges to our democratic way of life.