“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Each such incident is like, now, a small morality play, with a lesson to be learned, and therefore each such incident is a step ahead in terms of progress and understanding. [...]

[...] Those who did not agree with him, he saw as moral enemies. [...]

[...] This time of very poor circumstances, but of somewhat moral caliber. [...]

[...] Obviously it deals with the development of values — not moral values, however, but values for which you really have no adequate words. [...]

[...] Now, you are familiar with morality plays so in our story we take the term deceit and we give it a name and we make a person out of deceit and we call it, for example, Judas. [...]

[...] With your great belief in technology, it often seems to many people that television causes violence, for example, or that it causes a love of overmaterialism, or that it causes “loose morals.” [...]

[...] I can’t feel it’s moral to try and force it on anybody even though there’s money involved and we could use the money.”)

Moral values become attached to food, with some seen as good and some as bad. [...]

If this seems to involve you in a problem with morality, then let me add here that such information, on its own, unless handled with utmost care, would immediately involve the negative suggestion that could lead easily to the very condition that we hope she avoids.

Strong moral ideas welded what I am together—welded the creative drives like glue. [...]

[...] First of all, if you will forgive me, you would have no difficulty at all having orgasm with a man to whom you were deeply attracted if he were not your husband, and if you could get over the moral barriers that might prevent it—if you could convince yourself that it was all right.

I say wrong, meaning no moral judgment, but the application of one method to a pursuit that cannot be adequately expressed in such a fashion. [...]

[...] Some moral philosophers, medical geneticists, physicians, lawyers, and religious leaders believe that those who carry genes for serious genetic diseases do not have the right to reproduce. [...]

[...] The trouble is that ideas of right and wrong are intimately involved with your chemistry, and you cannot separate your moral values from your body.

Such secondary personalities in many cases will often mask themselves by adopting for a while moral postures in keeping with those of the dominant personality; but these will be soon discarded as the secondary personality further insinuates itself.

[...] Within your system, to kill is obviously a moral crime, but to kill another in punishment only compounds the original error. [...]

[...] It is not good for my morale. [...]

[...] An inner morality play if you want to use the term. [...]

[...] Building upon those limited assumptions, the individual in question tells us how ironic it is that the “new” portions of the human brain, those that have evolved within the last two million years, are responsible for the moral and technological problems our species now faces. [...]

(Within such a gloomy framework, then, I think it legitimate to ask how the species can consciously stress its accidental presence in the cosmos, yet demand that its members be the most “moral” of creatures. [...]

(For some years now, organized religion as a whole has been suffering from a loss of faith and members, stripped of its mysteries by science, which, with the best of intentions, offers in religion’s place a secular humanism — the belief that one doesn’t need blind faith in a god in order to be morally concerned for the common welfare; paradoxically, however, this concern is most of the time expressed in religious terms, or with religious feeling. [...]

With all Seth has told us about man’s potentials, I must admit that we’ve wondered at times why the race isn’t more developed morally and spiritually.