“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] There are two men in particular he would have met. [...]

The inner self, however, realizes that potentials are present that would not be present necessarily under other circumstances and that abilities can be brought to the foremost that could not be met under other circumstances. [...]

[...] I do not know if she is there now, but she was at that time and you met her in the hallway. [...]

(When that meeting took place, Jane was in trance; off came her glasses; once again she’d met Seth on the psychological bridge the two of them had established when these sessions began, over a decade ago. [...]

[...] The two women have not met often in recent years; Blanche was Jane’s instructor in French at Skidmore College, in Saratoga Springs, NY. [...]

[...] The attractions weaken, but during their duration, when certain conditions are met, communication can take place.

[...] He is a friend of yours, though you met him but once—yet in your work as always keep your counsel. [...]

[...] If you had to go through all that they had to go through to contact a beloved daughter, how would you feel if you were met with fear and terror? [...]

There are intertwining purposes then that were met. [...]

[...] Their characteristics appear only when certain conditions are met. [...]

[...] The particular purposes of your present personality can only be met in the present circumstances in the way that is best overall. The challenges can be met at another time and in another life, this is true. [...]

[...] For then a slip met with instant retaliation. [...]

[...] You will not see him thoroughly until you do so; and in carrying this image with you, you see, you do not see the possibilities in many individuals whom you have already met. [...]

(It is Friday evening as I type this; our dream records since Wednesday give no indication that either Jane or I remembered meeting each other, or Seth, or whether all of us met together.)

The characteristics of the ego therefore change as various situations are met. [...]

(11:10–11:43.) Now: even before you met each other many of your private abilities, and the thrust of your intellects and intuitions, made no sense in Darwinian or Freudian terms. [...]

[...] It is precisely because the object is loved that it is so disliked if expectations are not met. [...]

[...] Jane took the picture before I met her, some 11 years ago. [...]

(This afternoon Jane and I met a friend of John Bradley’s, Mrs. Lorraine Shafer, Horseheads, NY. [...]

[...] For the test object I used a wallet identification card that I picked up two years ago in an empty house that Jane and I nearly purchased. Both of us had met the owner of the house, Jim Birch, a few times. [...]

[...] They had however met here before on other than session nights.