“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] As a rule anything that you know is categorized by you as either memory or present experience, since usually you do not realize you have practical knowledge of what would seem to be the future. [...]

(As is often the case, Jane said she had no memory of the first portion of the chapter, given on May 4. Resume in the same fast manner at 10:27.)

You have a dream memory, of course, though you are not aware of it as a rule. [...]

[...] The memory of these is imprinted and registered by the body as faithfully and realistically as any ‘real’ odor. The experience becomes a part of [buried] memory and may be recovered through hypnosis. [...]

It simply ceases to so objectify itself, but it retains, or the self retains, memory of that objectification.

[...] The rich unconscious is wasteful in those terms, since it seems to you that it contains memories and sensations that are not used in practical everyday life.

[...] Their memories (long pause), became the basis for the birth of religion as you now think of it. [...]

[...] Such persons may or may not have a memory of their nightly activities. [...]

(Long pause at 10:20.) If you believe that you do not dream, however, you will inhibit memory of them — but you will still dream. [...]

If he reminds himself then he will have memory of some of these encounters, and this will be of help. [...]

You would retain a far greater memory of your subjective experiences, and your body would be healthier, if these sleeping patterns were changed. [...]

[...] He often commented upon his poor memory. [...]

[...] An easy enough example is the case where an individual with no memory [of such a dream] decides to cancel a plane trip on a given day, and later discovers that the plane crashed. [...]

[...] Even those with good dream-memories will find that persistant dream recall experiments are invaluable. [...]

[...] The ego would see no reason for such a memory and on general principles attempts to repress them.

Because there is no time, as you think of time, we will not say that action retains a memory of all its previous actions or selves, for this would be misleading. [...]

I am thinking here in particular of some cases of amnesia, where the victim suddenly ends up in a different town, with a different name, sometimes even with a different occupation, and with no memory of his past.

Second: “The Bible is a conglomeration of parables and stories, intermixed with some unclear memories of much earlier times. [...]

[...] My question concerned a hypothetical experiment in which, say, a hundred such writers would be hypnotized without being told what the purpose of the experiment was; once under, they would be queried about past-life memories. [...]

[...] Now there was a time, speaking in your terms, before the making of symbols; a time so divorced from your idea of reality that only in the most protected areas of sleep does any memory of it ever return. [...]

[...] It happens that this session was reconstructed from memory; since it was unscheduled I had not been prepared to take formal notes. [...]