“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The letters C A R which do not refer to a vehicle. [...]

[...] The letters C A R are part of the last name of a person I was thinking about prior to the session and this could be the reference. [...]

[...] He will then speak to you, but not as he would like to speak… He is now living in a town beginning with the letter A.

There is an S A G. If you meet someone with these letters significantly in their name, avoid them. [...]

[...] But she’s been bothered more than once lately by the contents of some of her mail — the letters of woe she attracts from readers who earnestly petition aid of various kinds from Seth and herself. Today the trigger was furnished by another letter from a lady who lives in Kentucky. [...]

[...] Answered 35 letters over the weekend … my mood seems again magically improved at least. Finished letter to the magazine; it gets mailed Monday A.M.” [...]

[...] Have been very relaxed; still lay down two or three times a day — do notes, read, rest … yesterday wrote letter to the editor about my mention in the ‘miracle’ article in [the well-known] psychology magazine.

[...] In the 198th session, Seth said she would receive a letter from her publisher by the next Saturday. Jane did receive a letter then from his secretary, but not a definitive one. [...]

[...] In his letter of October 22, the publisher certainly did write a cosmopolitan letter, in our opinion.

Approximately four days from now, I believe your Dr. Instream will receive an important letter, for which he has been waiting, and that he will receive confirmation concerning his own hypnosis experiments.

1. Seth’s letter for correspondents.

Ruburt has read your letter. [...]

[...] I am, therefore, dictating this letter, while it will be sent to many of you, it is written to each of you, and I only regret that I cannot go into your aspirations, challenges and problems on a more individual basis.

[...] In any case, energy is being sent out to you with this letter.

[...] There was a letter written the morning before (on Friday) by the same friends that had [...] From the way the letter was written, it seemed as if the friends—call them Peter and Polly—had already started on their journey that (Saturday) morning, and would stop in Elmira on their return much later toward evening. There was no time to answer the letter, of course.

[...] More is involved than the question: Did he perceive his information directly from the minds of his friends, or from the letter itself, which had already been mailed, of course, and was on its way to Ruburt at the time?

[...] In the dream I was drawing foot-high oval letters in black ink, but was worried about doing a good job because my hand was shaky. Then I realized I could cut out the letters from cardboard or some such, and ink them in that way. [...]

This does not mean that you should not write a clear letter stating your own reaction against the cover, if you so choose.

(“Several small letters or numbers, and a stamped card, from a distant place.” [...] The object contains small printed letters in the address in the upper left corner. [...]

[...] Black print or lettering or writing in a right-hand corner, extending outward toward the center.

[...] Several small letters or numbers, and a stamped card, from a distant place. [...]

[...] Louis Pomerantz’s small book has a rust red cover; the title is in reverse lettering, and this too has a cream tint.

[...] I noted them down letter by letter. [...]

[...] Reading over John Pitre’s two recent letters, John Bradley said it is perfectly possible to make alfalfa tea from alfalfa pills, or the plant itself. [...]

S E V; although these could be initials, I believe they are the first letters of a word. [...]

[...] An A and a G or J. Also the letters D O L, perhaps followed by another L (pause) and the number 63.

The initials or the letters seem to be connected with a square item, or package.

(“Also the letters D O L, followed perhaps by another L,” Here is another instance of Seth trying something new in the way of association, as he did with the D E L for delivery data in the last envelope experiment. [...]

(At break she now recalled that in addition to the D O L L which she had given voice to, and which she had seen mentally within, she had also seen the letters A R, but hadn’t spoken them aloud. [...]

[...] I worked on mail, reading several great letters and answering a couple. [...] I plan to send their proposal and letter to Lynne Lumsden, our editor at Prentice-Hall.

[...] He also asked for our copy of Reality Change, to copy for the file, and I added a copy of Maude’s letter also. I worked on Dreams this morning, and also did some quick rough work on a first draft of my own letter to be sent to those who give us money.

[...] Before the session Jane reread an earlier letter from Alma Priestley, and the carbon of her answering letter in June, 1971.)

(It’s of further interest to note that no sooner had I mailed a letter to Ms. O’Keefe this morning, asking her help in locating an address in London, than her letter was delivered at our door upon our return from the post office. [...]

(I’ll note here a small sign of the workings of Framework 2. Today I received a letter from the secretary of the British Psychic Society, Eleanor O’Keefe, thanking us for sending her an autographed copy of Cézanne a couple of weeks ago. [...]

(I could add that yesterday and today especially the mail had embodied the extremes of response Jane often gets to her work—from the incoherent to the very complimentary, from people literally begging for relief from possession, say, to inquisitive, thoughtful letters from psychologists and other professional people. But I caught both of us talking about the “negative” letters rather than the positive ones.

[...] I thought of Jane confining her replies to correspondents via postcard only, or at least only rarely sending out the letters with a longer reply to someone truly in need. [...]

(The mail was very heavy last week, and Jane still has a batch of Christmas cards to reply to yet, as well as a dozen “regular” letters, even after answering better than 35 letters.

[...] Be aware, however, of the sudden reassurances from Framework 2. (Also at Prentice)—The news program invitation (from ABC), which places you in a context, however small, of national interest—an invitation that you did not court; these, plus many excellent letters of late, should show you of course the beneficial aspects of your work that you can at times overlook (with irony). [...]

[...] Seth wrote the letter to Michael Kosok on July 28, 1975, in the 752nd session. Coupled with the letter is a treatise written by Jane herself, which contains excellent material on how our perceptions form our reality, from that of electrons on up. [...]

[...] (Eyes closed.) The letter I wrote to [Michael] Kosok does indeed apply, and in its way so does the article about the psychologist that Ruburt was telling you about. [...]

The question, you see, leads Ruburt to think of a letter from your sister-in-law, concerning a change of dates for a family affair.

[...] Now this is connected with Ruburt’s letter image. [...]

We will say that it is a letter, and we will say that it is from one of Ruburt’s parents. [...]

[...] “The question, you see, leads Ruburt to think of a letter from your sister-in-law, concerning a change of dates for a family affair.” [...]

[...] There was stuff I’ve also forgotten though that made me waken at once, furious; some connection between the two books, also whole bunches of feelings rise to my mind about the disclaimer being like a sign or statement that I’m a liar or that my work isn’t truthful or like, hell, the letter A for adulteress they used to pin on wicked women.... [...]

(Today I mailed to those in command at Prentice-Hall eight copies of our letter to the legal department, in response to their letter of November 24 explaining the disclaimer they want to use in Mass Events. [...]

[...] Many years ago his experience with different editors, in his short-story publishing days, led him to see that a story that hit one editor might not hit another, that his work would be much more easily accepted by some editors than others, and that some, it seemed, regardless of long enthusiastic letters, would not buy a thing. [...]