“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This morning I showed Pete Saul Cohen’s letter of late last week, re Steve’s idea for a Seth Production Co. [...]

[...] I wanted to go over some of the past sessions in this group with her, but we never did get to it, what with cigarettes, people coming in, my reading her letters from a fan and Steve Blumenthal, and so forth. [...]

[...] She has the laws of the two worlds confused (pause), and it is as if she had use of an entire alphabet, but the letters were not in order, but out of their proper arrangement, so that it was almost impossible to read the sentences, so to speak, that have then resulted. [...]

[...] This morning Sheri Peri called re her letters to England on behalf of Jane. [...]

[...] Even as I worked on this note Jane received a most enthusiastic letter of approval from a young woman who had just read Seth Speaks and Volume 1. To paraphrase a few lines: “Why isn’t the whole world reverberating with these fantastic ideas? [...]

In turn, the young lady’s letter reminded me of certain passages Seth had delivered in the 34th session for March 11, 1964. [...]

I think of a letter from another university, of three or four very brief paragraphs, not taking up the whole page.

[...] It may well be a letter that you have written him, and he concentrates on my name; and thinks (pause) of a picture in a frame, of his wife I believe, but not one just taken.

[...] On that day Jane received a letter from Prentice-Hall, outlining plans for publishing the Seth material. [...]

(I thought excitement from receiving the letter had as much to do with Jane’s feelings, as the beer.

[...] Just the same, with the attitude I had at the time, I’m glad I didn’t know about the letter that was to arrive the next day.

[...] Two days after the twenty-seventh session, we received a letter from him. [...]

The letter upset me considerably, yet it also objectified some of my own doubts. [...]

But the letter made me cautious, too. [...]

If many of your letters are from those in need, this also shows that people, who were previously in despair at finding any methods to help themselves, now want all the information they can get. [...]

(I asked if Seth would discuss Tam’s dream of January 1, 1973; her cold symptoms dating from last October; and the letter Seth has promised to dictate for correspondents. [...]

[...] Seth didn’t get to the letter for correspondents. [...]

[...] I believe the letter G is somehow connected with this event.

(Seth continues the above data, and gives another instance of the freer association employed, all stemming from the letter M: “I do not know—massage, mucilage—leave it for now.” [...]

[...] I believe the letter G is somehow connected with this event.” [...]

(It will be noticed that we received the psychiatrist’s letter about Feb. [...]

[...] It is important that I clear up these doubts, as they worried Ruburt since the first reading of the psychologist’s letter.

[...] of the session she had deliberately “held off” any dissociation, being quite upset by the psychiatrist’s letter. [...]

[...] I read her two letters from female scientists in California that, I thought, would cheer her a great deal, since they both stressed the value of her work. [...]

[...] The behavior of Instream, the other psychologist at Oswego, the demand for credentials from Fell and others, the letters asking for help of various kinds—especially those from the unbalanced—all of these things and more added up in her eyes to an indictment, one might say, of one’s very nature. [...]

[...] Many such people want the truth, in capital letters, in quite literal form, without creativity slurring the message, so to speak, or blurring the absolute edges of fact and fiction. [...]

[...] That last is in small letters, and gods shall always be in small letters. [...]

[...] This morning I’d written two letters to people who had sent us donations, I told Jane. [...]

[...] Although she was by then receiving quick mental answers to many of our questions in the sessions, often she was still cautiously verifying those responses by having at least their beginnings spelled out letter by letter upon the board. [...]

(Yesterday we received Dr. Instream’s letter of October 11, in which he asked that Seth try giving data on one location and one object in the clairvoyant tests.

(Not having heard from her publisher yet, as he had promised she would by now, Jane wrote and mailed to him a pretty stiff letter. [...]

[...] Jane’s feet were moving a little as I read a letter. [...]

End of session, my fine letter-writer, and a fond good evening to you both. [...]