“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] A few weeks later I received a letter from a friend in California. [...] In the letter, my friend also wrote a page about a family celebration.

In March of 1968, for example, I received a letter in which my mother told me that Mike Myers, an old friend, was dead, and that his widow was very upset. [...]

A letter concerning a distasteful situation. The letter to or from another man, perhaps in his late fifties, and in another area of the country. Dr. Instream either wrote the letter or received it.

[...] “I think he was also answering some of the points that psychologist made in his letter,” she said. [...]

[...] The visitors, the letters, and the overall implications.

[...] And each one is a letter. [...]

[...] Your being rides upon that unstated reality, as a letter of the alphabet rides upon the inner organizations that are implied by its existence. [...]

(Last Saturday, April 24, Jane received another letter from F. Fell, publisher, and mailed her answer today. [...]

The letter to the publisher is a perfectly acceptable one.

(As we waited for tonight’s session to begin I read to Jane a letter I’ve just written to a prominent biologist. [...]

(The scientist in question may never answer my letter, but it’s already had one unexpected beneficial effect: Tonight, after he finished book dictation, Seth gave an excellent summation of his own version of what our species like to call evolution. [...]

[...] You may receive a letter from your Aunt Bessie, for example. [...] All of these thoughts and images will be colored by the emotions that are connected to the letter, and to all of the events with which you and your aunt have been involved.

Beside this, he received a letter in the mail, reporting the worst kind of nonsense, saying that the correspondent and his wife had heard that I was holding back “Unknown” 2, because the information could not be handled by the populace. [...]

The letter re-aroused several states of feeling: time taken for “Unknown” 2, for one thing, but also Ruburt was struck by the gullibility of the correspondents, who were saying in effect that they could not lead their lives properly unless Ruburt could deliver the material. [...]

(Today we received from Larry Dowler of the Yale archives a letter giving us his latest thoughts, as well as a form to sign. [...]

(This morning I wrote Maude Cardwell a short letter, promising more later, both from ourselves and via our lawyer. [...]

[...] The plastic shaker I used contains no markings except the letter P. The McCormick can contains the words “4 Oz.”. [...]

(The letter P enters in through the initial on top of the shaker. [...]

[...] He may write his name on a check, or scrawl an inadequate letter to a relative, and his very handwriting might even deteriorate. [...]

When you were discussing the letter from the young English gentleman, Ruburt was impressed with his progress. [...]

Another note: Ruburt’s letters, business letters. [...]

[...] Today — just in time — we’d received a letter from a young lady who played a supporting role in the film. [...]

[...] Sarah wrote Ruburt a letter, telling him of the movie. [...]

[...] I have every letter in the house answered. [...]

[...] See above [this page] for a copy of J. Pitre’s letter, of September 21, 1967. [...]

Even as I wrote this note Jane received a letter “Do what I ask for me, if you are not a fraud….” I threw the letter away. [...]

[...] In accidental ways that would be quite humorous if they weren’t so personal, we’ve also learned what negative ideas others can have about us: A person will inadvertently reveal to us, during a conversation, or in a letter or over the telephone, the unflattering opinions his or her mate, or parents, or friends, really have of Jane and me and the work we’re engaged in with the Seth material.

[...] I too wondered about dispensing with answering the mail, while being very reluctant to do so, since many of the letters are openly laudatory, and we save them for reference [although we haven’t actually used any for such purposes]. [...]

[...] I hadn’t even answered Larry Dowler’s long letter of acceptance beyond sending him a short note of thanks for all his work. [...]

[...] Today I mailed Jane’s letter to Meredith Wheeler of ABC News, declining MW’s second recent invitation to be on that show; and when Tam called this afternoon to tell Jane that a British journalist was at CBS in NYC, and wanted to interview her for a newspaper article, we decided to not call back and okay the interview. [...]

[...] I added that although we’d talked about doing so—and had even mentioned doing so in our letter to the legal department last December—I’d also felt that she wouldn’t stand for such an action. [...]