“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(11:25.) The vocabulary used in the regular class was interpreted in the psyche in that manner, and it was literally and symbolically true language. [...]

[...] He also lists more practice elements, and discusses language, personhood, physics, and some of my own reincarnational experiences. [...]

[...] Such a book will always be expressed through those invisible national characteristics that are so intimately involved with language—and obviously, were that not so; no book could be understood by someone of a foreign language. [...]

[...] It is useless, therefore, to attempt any description of it through usual vocabulary, for your language primarily allows you to identify physical rather than nonphysical experience.

[...] Your use of language may make you impatient for definitions, however. [...]

[...] Ruburt’s spontaneity escaped all of his “language,” in other words. [...]

[...] It might also be advisable for the patient to take up some completely new field of knowledge — to learn a language, for instance, or to study whatever books possible in any field to which he or she is attracted.

[...] And the language is that of poetry. The form alienates many people because they are afraid of leaving the structured language of prose behind.

Ruburt would not be familiar with a good many of the words and phrases used, even if translation from the original languages was made. [...] Some of these languages dealt with pictures rather than words. [...]

[...] For perhaps five minutes she sang to the class in Sumari,² the trance language she initiated a few years ago. [...]

[...] In your terms it is the build up of natural anger; in animals, say, it would lead to a face-to-face encounter, of battle stances in which each creature’s body language, motion, and ritual would serve to communicate a dangerous position. [...]

[...] It was not meant to be the cringing act of a martyr who said, “Hit me again,” but represented a biologically pertinent statement, a communication of body language. [...]

[...] Word structures and language itself bears a unique mathematical precision. [...]

There are unities, barely contemplated, then, between language, exterior communication, the physical nervous system, and time, or your idea of it. [...]

[...] The speakers are those inner voices that first taught you physical languages. [...]

[...] To one extent or another, all creatures use language (underlined), implying a far vaster sociobiological relationship than is usually supposed. [...]

[...] A spoken sentence has a certain structure in any language. [...]

(In the room next to ours—332—I heard a familiar wail and cry in a foreign language. [...]

[...] They are born with the knowledge of how to think, with the propensity for language. [...]

[...] However, after that session my impression ‘grew’ in such a way that I knew this family had something to do in a more direct way with the printing process — with the fascination of putting ideas down on paper through the use of typefaces that would, as much as the language involved, express the ideas behind the words themselves. [...]

[...] Let alone the bulk of Jane’s other work: her poetry, novels both published and unpublished, her other published books, an unfinished autobiography, the records of her ESP class sessions, her journals and paintings, her singing in musical trance language, Sumari, her never-ending correspondence. [...]

(During break Nadine spoke of body language. [...]

Forget body language, you will not be using it all the time you know. [...]

[...] Telepathy accounts for the usefulness of spoken language. Without telepathy no language would be intelligible. [...]

[...] Jane also sang in her trance language, Sumari.

In as simple a language as possible, and to some extent in your terms, the electron’s spin determines time “sequences” from your viewpoint. [...]