“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] They were not intelligent. [...]

[...] They are not used to dealing with imaginative concepts, or conceptual thought, or of applying the intelligence to the realm of the imagination. [...]

[...] Past lives have involved him with personalities either strongly intuitive or strongly intelligent, highly overbalanced in one category or the other. [...]

[...] They may be intelligent or stupid, gifted or mundane, but they are frightened of experiencing themselves as themselves, or of acting according to their own wishes. [...]

[...] I am not speaking of some dumb instinct, but instead of an intuitive knowing, a high intelligence different from your own, but amazingly complex, with which other species are equipped.²

[...] He comes through as an extremely attractive, highly intelligent young woman, with strong psychic and creative abilities, unusual insight into the problems of others—as a writer, a psychic, and as “the mistress” of a delightful establishment.

[...] That portion he equates with mind or intelligence. [...]

(Pause.) The scientists have long stood on the side of “intelligence and reason,” logical thought, and objectivity. [...]

Highly intelligent parents, therefore, may find themselves with a retarded child. [...]

Instead see your body quite intelligently, and inform it that some of your attitudes have distressed it. [...]

You have the intelligence and the intuition to realize that what I am telling you is for your own good. [...]

Ruburt has recently used the suggestion “Infinite intelligence leads me and guides me in all my ways.” [...]

[...] He is highly intelligent, perceptive and no one’s fool.

[...] There were endlessly complicated, multitudinous religious and cultural justifications for such a situation, so that the entire affair seemed, often, even to the most intelligent of men, self-evident. [...]

The personality also contains good intellectual capacities, and he should examine psychic experience in the light of his intelligence also. [...]

[...] The autistic child [can be] highly intelligent, however.

[...] He was quite intelligent, a musician who had written an “opera,” he told us. [...]

[...] I am not speaking now necessarily in terms of size, although size as you know it is extremely relative, and it is only within the physical domain that size is granted importance, for outside of it intelligence does not need so massive a house.

A young man from a nearby town came here recently — a highly gifted, intelligent young person. [...]

You ended your classifications where you did, however, preferring to see man as the king of intelligence. [...]