“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The inert substance is not inert. Within your system you activate certain elements... The stress reaction changes the substance... so that it is no longer inert.

(Jane took a break at 10:28. Her trance had been good. John Bradley said at first that he knew of nothing he is taking into his system that would encourage fluid retention. He said he very occasionally takes Metamucil, which is inert.

[...] Words on a printed page for example are not dead, nor are they merely inert symbols. [...]

[...] The least information is not inert. [...]

[...] You are not a soul encased in inert clay.

[...] These are not inert data,¹ then. [...]

[...] It is not dead or inert. [...]

It is somewhat humorous that such a vital consciousness could even suppose itself to be the end product of inert elements that were themselves lifeless, but somehow managed to combine in such a way that your species attained fantasy, logic, vast organizational power, technologies, and civilizations. [...]

[...] When your friend asked his question he was, I believe, referring to the point at which self-consciousness entered into so-called inert form.

You know now that so-called inert form has consciousness. [...]

[...] Your physical form can lie sleeping and inert upon the bed while your consciousness travels in a dream form to places quite distant. [...]

[...] There is not an inert ideal thing called knowledge that you can drink up. [...]

As you know, so-called inert objects possess consciousness also, though in a more generalized and much less specific manner, in which to a large degree choice is denied to them. [...]

[...] Consciousness did not arrive because inert matter suddenly soared into activity and song. [...]

[...] The condition gives the body its refreshment, yet it does not lie inert for such long periods of time.

[...] It is not dead or inert. [...]

[...] If you must, then think of that earth consciousness as grading (spelled) upward in great slopes of awareness from relatively “inert” particles of dust and stone through the mineral, vegetable, and animal kingdoms. [...]

[...] Consciousness did not arrive because inert matter suddenly sparked into activity and song. [...]

When I say that chemicals alone will not give you consciousness, I am speaking of the theory held that physical matter, chemicals and atoms, that were inert and lifeless, suddenly through some metamorphosis attained the conscious state through an evolutionary development.

[...] The effect was far from inert, though. [...]

[...] … When he asked it, he was referring to the point at which self-consciousness entered into so-called inert form. [...]

[...] Action that seems to be of a static nature, you refer to as inert matter. [...]