“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I believe it is apparent in our own tests, incidentally, that some preciseness is beginning to show through, for in the general associations connected with the object, identifying points concerning the specific object now appear.

(October 18, 11:30 to Noon, Monday: Jane specifically requested information of the Gallaghers, but she did not list anything they were able to identify.)

[...] Identified by a round symbol on it, with a border inside the circle, and some sort of figures. [...]

[...] You identified with your father, and could not permit, in this dream at any rate, an identification of this kind, since at this childish level you did not blame him and would have wished as a child, to have the power to do the same thing.

[...] And as Bill Gallagher pointed out, they probably heard the deep Seth voice while in the hall outside our door; upon admittance they saw no one with which to identify such a voice. [...]

Ruburt’s set of beliefs for some time were so invisible, and he identified with them so completely, that it was extremely difficult for him to examine them in the light of the present and his now situation.

[...] Identified by a round symbol on it, with a border inside the circle, and some sort of figures. [...]

You identified fairly strongly with your father as a boy. [...]

I’d identified all life with the birds, of course. [...]

[...] I think I’d known the name all the while and in the dream translated it into action; the clothes episode would, then, really identify Anna and forsee the event in which she showed me the clothes closet.

[...] She could have made a pact ahead of time to “borrow” certain strong mystical qualities from her maternal grandfather, who was part French Canadian and part Canadian Indian (specific tribe unknown by us), and with whom she strongly identified as a child. [...]

[...] He partially identified some of my traits with some of yours, so if he was mad at you for telling him, literally to his way of thinking, to hurt himself five times a day by getting up and down from the floor, he was twice as mad at me.

[...] I attempted to give several definite characteristics that would serve to identify your Jesuit’s mother, and I believe that we succeeded.

(Jane received this remark on January 23, 1964, according to her notes, just as she was dropping off to sleep: “If you would identify yourself with your entity instead of with your present personality, you’d be a lot better off.” [...]

The infant with whom he momentarily identified as the self he is now only opaquely and indirectly shared common experience. [...]

We identify with our bodies, as indeed the psychologists tell us that we must. [...]

[...] When people think in terms of one self, they of course identify with one body. [...]

[...] Your artistic ability does not belong to your ego, dear Joseph, though I understand as I speak that anyone on your plane identifies himself with his ego, and when he says “I am,” he means he is his ego, or his ego is.

[...] You identified in terror with the animal, and hence when you stepped on the nail for a moment the identification brought on the physical condition.

[...] Jane and I haven’t been to Jerusalem, although we’d like to make the trip some day, but even if we did I don’t think it would be easy to identify the physical site of my “fourth Roman.” [...]

First, though, I’ll explain that in sessions Seth refers to Jane by her male entity name, Ruburt — and that he does so (as I quote him in Appendix 18) simply because “the given entity identifies itself more with the so-called male characteristics than with the female.” [...]

If you do not realize this emotionally then you tend to immobilize yourself, as you did the other night, when identifying your neighbor with your mother. [...]