“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

He protected himself against early marriage or child bearing by identifying the male writer to some extent with his own writing image. [...]

You must first of all cease identifying yourself completely with your ego. [...]

[...] You get in trouble only when you identify too strongly with the socially inoculated man, so that you can say “With my beliefs, I do not think I can learn to put Prentice in Framework 2.” [...]

[...] (The facial difference was now quite marked; Jane looked older.) The symbol to help you identify a sphere with lines like rays. [...]

[...] The physical time idea is a product of the ego’s tendency to make finer distinctions in order that it can classify and categorize, and therefore identify and give permanence to its own sensations.

[...] The affair frightens him nevertheless because, as mentioned earlier, he identifies strongly with his own bodily tensions. [...]

[...] As long as you insist upon identifying creative time with physical time, the dilemma will be real. [...]

This sense of division within the self forces you to think that there is a remote, spiritual, wise, intuitive inner self, and a bewildered, put-upon, spiritually ignorant, inferior physical self, which happens to be the one you identify with. [...]

[...] While being independent individuals their members also identified with their ancestors to some extent, accepting them as portions of their selfhoods. [...]

While each person generally follows a given strand of consciousness, and identifies with it as “myself,” there are other alternate lines beneath the surface. [...]

[...] He identifies strongly with his work, so that there is often, however, a misunderstanding on his part, so that if you criticize, say, any portion of the work, or his handling of it with Prentice or whatever, he often takes that as a criticism of himself. [...]

In the dream they both stood for completely different attitudes of your own, and here you see them objectified in your separate parents—for you do indeed identify those different tendencies with your parents to a strong extent. [...]

It has to do with their own background and environment and it does not apply unless the woman is strongly identified in terms of one sex only. [...]

[...] Sometimes it is difficult to identify idealists, because they wear such pessimistic clothing that all you can see are the patterns of a sardonic nature, or of irony. [...]

[...] The information was specific, and you retained most of the identifying data.

[...] To some extent you have been trapped by the object, trying so hard to identify with it that this kind of expansion was not possible.

[...] For I feel now, in connection with the two “new” poems, the same profound sensations I had concerning Jane’s challenges when I wrote in Note 6: “Perhaps it was her poetic art of expression that helped me identify so strongly with her emotions, but I suddenly felt that even I had never really understood the myriad depths of her challenges and her reactions to them.” [...]

We will also then give further information that should serve to identify the gentleman with the back difficulty. [...]

[...] Beyond that, they identify themselves with the spirit of life within them so fully and so completely that to question its meaning would be inconceivable. [...]

[...] At the present point he identifies with the name that he has given you. [...]