“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

This was the reason for the rather abrupt switch from the Frank Watts identity to my own. [...]

[...] None of them are identical. [...]

[...] This entity is that synthesization that Dunne did not foresee, but it in no way implies a loss of individual identities. This is extremely difficult to explain, since when I use the word individual identity, I am not referring primarily to egotistical identity alone. [...]

[...] The personality structure changes, it is true, but consciousness of overall identities within any given unit of consciousness is always retained. [...]

[...] They were identical in design and had wooden handles.

It is theoretically possible, for example, for any of you to disperse your consciousness and become a part of any object in the room — or to fly apart, to disperse yourself out into space — without leaving your sense of identity. [...]

In itself an object should be then felt as its unique identity, and as a part of the whole universe. [...]

“Something identical to something else … two or two of a kind.” [...]

Seth has dropped some hints as to the identity of the artist who is passing on this data to him. [...]

[...] Did a meson, for example, choose to participate in an atom-smashing experiment in order to merely peek in on our gross physical reality for much less than the billionth of a second it exists with that identity, before it decays into electrons and photons? [...]

([Arnold:] “We don’t really do violence against an identity or whole self, but only against a self-created camouflage system.”)

[...] There are people that you would not share your living room with who do not consider themselves avant-garde or open-minded, who do not understand concepts and are not equipped to intellectualize, but people who feel their own feelings with exaltation and joy and recognize their own identities because of this, and who are, therefore, open to the feelings of others and able to relate to them. [...]

[...] The psyche from which your identity springs is free of the picture of reality that you have chosen. [...]

[...] (This kind of thinking usually reminds me of a certain statement Seth made half a dozen years ago; see Note 7 for Session 727: “Creatures without the compartment of the ego can easily follow their own identity beyond any change of form.”)

(The man resembled Rob to an amazing degree, except that he was an older version; profile darn near identical, hair white, same brows and same expression as Rob has when deeply upset. [...]

[...] Your identity is within you and do not look for it in others. [...] When you realize that your own identity is within you will not spend energy seeking to find yourself in others. [...]

[...] I took it for granted that he wouldn’t consider that we had any scientific evidence, but we did have the nearly identical sketches, and the impressions were correct. [...]

[...] However for the further development of consciousness and of identity, the so-called waking I can be of great benefit.

[...] … (A one-minute pause.) These units of consciousness, however, add themselves up to form psychological beings far greater in number than, say, the number of stars in [your] galaxy (over 400 billion of them), and each of those psychological formations has its own identity—its own soul if you prefer—its own purpose in the entire fabric of being.

[...] It is a portion of physical matter that you have identified, filled out with your own identity. [...]

[...] You are trying to redefine the very definitions of personal identity—no easy task. [...]

[...] In some cases, their more mundane identities were never divulged but to a few. [...]