“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Here any expression becomes almost taboo. [...]

[...] I will go into this perhaps soon, for there are the similarities here and significances, involving states of consciousness used by both Ruburt and myself, and the type of projection achieved. [...]

(Here Jane came out of trance and indicated that Florence was “supposed to do something” tonight. [...]

[...] I think that Seth’s energy propels me into Sumari when he initiates a song, as he did here. [...]

(I suppose that one can find all sorts of variations within counterpart situations, all sorts of reasons for such affiliations, so I can merely hint at a few here as they rise out of the class framework or orbit around it:

[...] Again, if you speak the English sentence “I am here,” you cannot speak the Chinese version at the same time. [...]

[...] His intentions were of the best, but I suppose that I must now feel obligated—and I do—to go into the matter of mental and emotional stability and any dangers to such stability that might be involved here.

[...] Withdrawal into dissociation as a hiding place from the world could be dangerous, and many have fallen prey here. [...]

[...] I am using the word “norm” here for your convenience, though I disagree with the ways in which the term has been used, when it has been set up as a rule (underlined) of measurement, psychologically speaking. [...]

[...] There are many unsolved challenges here. [...]

(Appendix 12 for Volume 2 is on evolution; I was surprised to realize that Jane’s reading it today had apparently triggered Seth’s material here.)

[...] Before all of this, however, nature was seen as primarily passive—put here by God for man’s purpose, but without possessing the uniqueness or even approaching the status of man. [...]

Now your attitudes for example toward this apartment formed your reality here from the moment you walked in. [...]

[...] There is a connection here. [...]

[...] There are other aspects here, in that in your last reincarnational life you had somewhat greater freedom within the sexual framework. [...]

[...] Now in your paintings, many of them, you merge the male and female characteristics—the feminine compassion and intuition often appearing as it does here in a male face.

I am speaking here in more or less historic terms for you. [...]

(Here Seth was making a little joke, for Jane has been doing some writing lately which she has tentatively entitled “Adventures in Consciousness.”)

[...] And good evening to our friend here (Sue). [...]

(Here Seth humorously referred to my recent interest in John the Baptist. [...]

Another small point here: Christ’s dictum to turn the other cheek (Matthew 5:39, for instance) was a psychologically crafty method of warding off violence — not of accepting it. [...]

(A note added later: After comparing the information in this session with some of Seth’s material of previous years, Jane wrote a statement for insertion here:

There is something highly important here concerning your technological civilization: As your world becomes more complicated, in those terms, you increase the number of probable actions practically available. [...]

7. Seth gave two blocks of material in Seth Speaks that are analogous to what he tells us here. [...]

[...] Here you are working with the mind itself as your material, and merely suggesting that it operate in a certain fashion. [...]

[...] There is nothing serious here, or I would discuss it this evening in any case, since you asked. [...]

[...] There have been other instances of bungling, too, not necessary to describe here. [...]

So for a minute I even called myself Israel, I guess, but there’s more connections here that I haven’t got. [...]

(9:46.) Your ideas of God are put to the test in this meeting (at Camp David), for here men who claim to believe in a merciful God discuss their mortal claims to property and land, and each feels behind him the ancient dictates of an archaic God.

[...] Obviously I am speaking here of scientific dogma, but such dogma is far more religious than scientific, for it also expects to be believed without proof, on faith alone.