“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] For one thing it is harmful, and believe me I will go into the reasons at a later date. [...]

[...] Nevertheless they harm no one. [...]

[...] The gullible can do us more harm than the skeptical.

In such a case incidentally, you were not a part of the battle, and you cannot be harmed. [...]

I know your cat meant no harm, and would regret depriving him of his playmate, except that when it is possible it is not only wise but advantageous to help any living creature, regardless of its stature in your scheme of things.

[...] Dormant viruses — which up to now have done no harm — are activated.

If you are speaking in terms of that particular statement—those statements—if you cannot avoid making those particular statements, then you will do the children harm. [...]

[...] For one thing such errors are not numerous, nor really were these particular errors harmful. [...]

[...] For one thing, it is harmful, and I will go into the reasons at another date. [...]

[...] In such a case, incidentally, you were not a part of the battle and could not be harmed. [...]

[...] Christ is one of these: in some respects the most ideal detective — in a different context, however — out to save the good and to protect the world from harm. [...]

A simple one-word question would probably not be harmful, but it is best for now to wait until the end.

[...] Therefore the distortions are much less harmful, more easily discovered and cleared. [...]

[...] No one can deny that a war fought by dreaming men at specified times would be less harmful than a physical war — to return to my flight of fancy. [...]

“We do not want an individual to suggest that he dream of harming another. [...]

[...] Therefore the distortions are much less distortive, much less harmful, and more easily discovered and cleared … Others less perfectionist than myself are content with more distortion. [...]