“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] We could have told no one what was happening, we could have contacted a spiritualist group or we could have informed the parapsychologists. [...] The spiritualist groups would have been out in any case, because of my views at the time on religion in general. [...]

[...] Six of a group. (Another 40-second pause.) That is a particular group. [...]

[...] I believe the same group was with me. [...]

(Now I was in a shack in the tropics, again at night, with the rest of the group. [...]

[...] This does not mean he does not enjoy discussing his work with others, with individuals or small groups, carefully chosen or at home, or that he does not enjoy reading poetry, say, on those occasions. [...]

[...] (Pause.) He would probably see more groups, as you both did at 458 together, were it not for the black or white thinking, but this would be in response to quite spontaneous urgings to do so. [...]

[...] Most religions per se, however, set up as permissible certain groups of experiences while denying others. They limit themselves by applying the principles of the sacredness of life only to your own species, and often to highly limited groups within it.

[...] It was safer that way, sometimes say 4 men would go together in a group.

(At one moment I thought I glimpsed, far ahead on the horizon on the right, a group of pyramids, in some kind of cool brilliant color, blues or greens. [...]

[...] I suggested reading some of the first sessions in the new group to Jane, before I turned her, and did so. [...]

[...] You can, however, collect information and statistics applying to any one group, and keep collecting it until you find that you do live in a reality in which all men certainly seem to be fools, or murderers, or hostile to creative people.

[...] Then—underlined three times—you will find it easy also, amazingly easy, to find some format for seeing others—I imagine small groups, sometimes of professionals, at comfortable periods of time throughout a year. [...]

[...] Or, my group has the truth and no other group has.

[...] A member of a monastic group (Jane leaned forward) who classified and collected various kinds of seeds. Now, this group worked on manuscripts officially, so to speak, but our friend here and several others were bootleg seed finders, believing against generally held theories at the time that many questions concerning nature could be found by examining nature.

There was some rivalry among these groups, as well as some cooperation. [...] There was some mating among these groups — that is, among the groups in existence at any given time.

(Our beliefs and intents cause us to pick “from an unpredictable group of actions,” or probabilities, those that we want to happen, as Seth tells us in the 681st session in Volume 1; therefore, from my physically oriented probability the considerable work I’ve put into this paper is an examination of evolution in connection with a number of Seth’s concepts. [...]

[...] In class, Seth discussed Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution,⁷ and that material, some of which wasn’t published in the 582nd session is the source for my second group of excerpts:)

[...] But it never fails, as “they” say: The members of each “pressure group,” whatever its orientation, want to see things their way — very human performances, I’m afraid. [...]

[...] When we got up this morning I told Jane that I’d had a dream that we’d been participating in group sex at a party, but that I couldn’t recall anything more than that. [...]

[...] Men did not begin hunting animals until certain groups of animals needed a way to control their own population. [...]

There was a greater and greater body of knowledge to be transmitted as physical existence continued, for they did not transmit private knowledge only, but the entire body of knowledge that belonged to the group or tribe as a whole.

[...] You can make group predictions, and overall make certain judgments, but other elements are involved, so that any particular genetic element cannot be pinned down in terms of its development. [...]

[...] It was a small group of about fifteen students, so I suggested that they come to my apartment instead. [...]

[...] Also, we recorded a few moments of conversation, so that my normal voice could be compared with Seth’s. Even the most lecturelike private session is always enlivened by Seth’s gestures, and this is more marked when he is relating to a group.

[...] The ego at any given time in this life is simply the part of us that “surfaces”; a group of characteristics that the inner self uses to solve various problems. [...]

[...] The three sections of milkweed pod shown are made up groups of lines; each group contains about the same number and arrangement of lines, whether one would consider them black or white. One could find arrangements of five lines in each of these groups, but could also count more or less, depending on approach. [...]

[...] The personality as you know it is merely the result of action as you perceive it in certain groupings at any given time.

Now on the question of “mental disorders,” it is highly important that individual integrity be stressed, rather than the blanket definitions that are usually accorded to any group of symptoms. [...]

[...] In sleep your consciousness fluctuates between ranges of intensities, literally flowing into and out of the physical-matter grouping, and forming from more plastic “pre-matter” (with a hyphen) stages, the final shape that matter will take in your world. [...]