“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] In your terms it is as if (louder) they perceive the future motion or direction of an idea, a concept, or a structure. [...]

There is one small point I wanted to mention this evening, merely for future reference: We have hardly begun any thorough study of the dream universe, and have dealt with it mainly in connection with other discussions. [...]

[...] The scope of consciousness will be so broadened in the future that all personality fragments, split personality images, and even individual fragments in succeeding incarnations, will be held in clear focus without strain. [...]

[...] It was to be elaborated upon in the future.

The second dream projected the fears of the first, anticipating what you were afraid would happen in the future.

[...] One episode involved a small future projection, and was intermixed with ordinary dream elements. [...]

[...] But more study is required here, and with this knowledge in mind, we will try to more accurately assess the table’s performance at future sessions.

Creativity itself has its own built-in discipline, the kind that, for example, in a dream can rummage through the days of the future to find precisely the data required to make a specific point.

[...] You cannot see into the future, for example, or into the past.

Darwin’s theories, and Freud’s for that matter, will in the future be seen as any other antiquated, outmoded system—yet from their ashes will rise new ways of interpreting and experiencing reality. [...]

[...] I think it’s very dangerous to take too hard a position at this time on anything we think we’ve learned, for I can’t imagine that in future millennia we’ll ever cling to very much of what we think is ‘true’ today—especially about things like illness. [...]

The remarks are these—We will and we have, to a very small extent here, begun a study of multidimensional psychology...and it will be the psychology of the future for it will regard personality in its true and entire light. [...]

[...] A mystic of some renown who was well-known for looking into the future.

I suppose you are putting this into the session for the use of future historians.

I would suggest in the future that you attend the board at regular sessions. [...]

The present simply should not be negatively projected into the future. [...]

[...] (Humorously.) It is used to past, present and future, kept nicely apart.

[...] From your threshold or focus you would be relatively unaware of your own motion on a new time threshold—for to the beings on that threshold you would have already arrived, while to you in your present their existence would at best be theoretical, as if they were future selves. [...]

[...] I think it’s very dangerous to take too hard a position on anything we think we’ve learned as a species, for I can’t imagine that in future millennia we’ll ever cling to very much of it. [...]

[...] But even these latest scientific theories are based upon ideas of a past, present, and future; their proponents do not consider that basically time is simultaneous—that the universe is being created now. We had an interesting discussion. [...]

[...] In one respect I do agree with Ruburt, in that any future experiments with friends would be of better advantage carried out using chairs at a table, and actually making as few suggestions as possible.

(Jane and I decided to record tonight’s session, and to make it a practice to do so more often in the future. [...]