“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In the meantime we decided to write someone else in the field. [...]

[...] Dr. Osis wrote that he wasn’t interested in the material itself, since it didn’t fall within his field of empirical psychology. [...]

After greeting Dr. Instream, Seth said: “My field is education, and my particular interest is that these [seemingly paranormal] abilities of human personality be understood and investigated, for they are not unnatural, but inherent. [...]

“We have many fields of common interest, you and I. The personality must always be considered in an elemental way as patterns of action. [...]

My field is indeed education, and my particular interest is that these abilities of human personality be understood and investigated. [...]

[...] A discussion followed involving the sessions in general, the field of psychic investigation, proofs, etc. [...]

[...] We have many fields of common interests... [...]

[...] We should avoid personal polemics in the field and not get involved; just as he has always gone his own way. [...]

I am going to say more here concerning those characteristics of Ruburt’s whole self, which allow me to communicate with your field. [...]

These moment points, incidentally, serve as reference points often from one field of activity to another, as openings or entryways. [...]

[...] Once this apparent separate ego is formed, and once a fair amount of stability is maintained, and a new identity arrived at, the initial desire and energy will maintain the ego in its position during its existence in any field. [...]

[...] The information you receive from your culture, from your arts, sciences, fields of economics, is all translated, decoded, turned into cellular information. [...]

[...] The time of the great masters in the fields of painting and sculpture is a case in point (humorously and louder)—so you see, I am getting to one of your favorite questions,² and we will continue the discussion at our next session.

[...] To link the “great masters” with our species’ reincarnational intents and drives, as Seth mentions in this session, opens up a new field for understanding my question, and a very large and intriguing one indeed.

The field that connects the personality to this kind of pseudoimage is actually formed by extensions of psychic energy. Imagine it, the field, if you will, as a thin but sturdy thread that connects the pseudoimage with the original image. [...]

[...] In your field of activity this sort of connection must always exist.

[...] Portions of the electrical universe are projected into many fields. Therefore electricity to some degree is recognized as a reality within many fields.

Regardless of the field of reality from which the data is received, to a large extent the mechanisms are the same. [...]

[...] The scientist’s field of inquiry involves these. [...]

[...] And its survival is obviously a necessity for existences within the physical field, if it is to deal effectively with camouflage reality.

[...] The living however can within certain limits make it difficult for those personalities who are finished with the physical field, because of a lack of understanding of circumstances. [...]

[...] A personality, or personalized energy, is never destroyed; but transformation of form remains a necessity for continuation of each personality, and in some cases an emotional denial on the part of the living, of this fact, can lead to resistance in so far as the personality of those no longer connected with the physical field. [...]

You must understand that to me now, mankind’s insistence upon recognizing as alive only those personalities with which he deals in the physical field, is a most limiting concept.

The physicians aid by giving precise overall directions to the body consciousness, simply facilitating healing, and directing energy—they are artists in their field. [...]

[...] It’s practically impossible, for example, to get free of the connotations of the worst elements of the whole field: the moment the subject comes up, we’re associated with all the history of mediumship in the most banal of terms. [...] Unfortunately, I suppose, this also means that we set ourselves outside the mainstream of activity in the field, and that our readership is likely to be pretty much confined to the “average” individual. [...]

Now when I talk to him I am always drawn back to the lilies of the field. [...]

[...] When you say the lilies of the field may, lose a leaf or two, but still have a great deal of protection, I was wondering had Ned’s fish, perhaps. [...]

[...] And portions of the atoms, themselves, that compose your body will run across the fields in Iowa a hundred years from now, changed and altered, but remembering their backgrounds. [...]

[...] They may be gifted in any field, but their primary interest will be in passing on their knowledge or that of others. [...]

[...] They can work in any field. [...]

[...] In whatever field, they devote themselves to perfecting the capacities of the body, which in others usually lie latent.

In the same way your unconscious also transforms for you, from an otherwise undifferentiated maze of reality, fields of activation into recognizable objects and events in your daily life.

[...] So when I mention techniques that will allow you to perceive other fields of reality beside your own, I want you to realize that these should be used to enhance your enjoyment of that creaturehood, and to enrich your sensual as well as spiritual expression.

[...] The car may disappear before your eyes, to be replaced by an animal, or the whole street may suddenly turn into a field. [...] Yet you may be suddenly perceiving the street, and the field that existed before it, and the images may be transposed one upon the other.

You might stand alone in your doorway, or in a field — or even on a street, surrounded by many people in a large city — look upward, suddenly struck by the great sweeping clouds above, and feel yourself a part of them. [...]

[...] Its field of activity has been limited because you have given it only facts to go on.

(She’d obviously, I thought, expected recognition by her peers in the writing field when she matured, with her obvious talents. [...]

(9:32.) Again, his natural abilities kept leading him, so it seemed, away from the straight novel framework into the science fiction format, where at that time he discovered that science fiction was not given any particular honor in the literary field. [...]

[...] It was as if he were considered a writer no longer, or as if the writing itself, while considered good enough, was also considered quite beside the point—of secondary concern, and in the psychic field the very word “creative” often has suspicious connotations. [...]

There are decisions in which each individual plays a part that are made in fields of activity that you usually do not even realize exist. [...]

[...] and your own participation in varying fields of expression that have not been given any official recognition.

[...] A reality that is involved with probabilities; and, as you glimpse that reality, you see that it is far vaster, and that it opens up into still other areas and fields and rooms. [...]

Now I want those of you who can to follow still further, for we will travel beyond these fields of probabilities in which all times are born. [...]

[...] The EE units, impressing a probable physical field, contain within them the latent knowledge of all of the various species that can emerge under those conditions. [...]

[...] To send our young to the battle field under those circumstances, then, to deprive individuals of the one life — the one priceless, irreplaceable attribute — seems the worst crime imaginable, I told Jane. [...]

In your physical field, and this limitation is important, in your physical field, truths are often caused by, or are the result of, expectations worked out. [...]

In your field of art you could do better now than he is in science fiction, since you are more sure of how you get your effects, and he is still not. [...]