“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

On February 1, 1968, I sent Dreams to Doubleday on suggestion of Reverend Crosson. On February 16—(2 days after Valentine’s Day) they wrote a letter of rejection.

On February 28, 1968—I sent Dreams to McGraw Hill.

This involves request from other publisher—same connection with February (the initials would be T. M. rather than Seth Material) and it would be a year off. Have no idea what Mossman looks like, etc. No travel.

[...] An S and I believe G…you should understand…the initials and dates may not correspond…1947 especially important to you…the initials I gave apply either to one individual or first names of two…the second child something different now…February or initial F…a connection with second child…February or FB…I do not know which…a turnabout with the child…a complete change of plan or a turnabout…a 36 connection…someone perhaps 36 years old connected somehow with this. [...]

[...] Gave up for adoption in February—Barb recalls whole episode well—emotionally upset.

(She did want to keep it—but pressure by family—agencies—she gave it for adoption February.

(Note: March 1, 3:05 p.m. Jane read this poem, and the one for February 29, quite easily without her glasses. [...]

FEBRUARY 28, 1984
4:16 P.M. TUESDAY

[...] She informed Jane that F. Fell was out of town for two weeks, and that he would be back in town—NYC—on February 7. F. Fell was out of town from Monday January 24, to Monday February 7. It developed that he was in Florida on a selling trip and vacation.

[...] A package was mailed to F. Fell on February 10. [...] Also, the tape was mailed to F. Fell on February 10 in a separate package.

[...] At the time she wrote this letter Jane had yet to receive letter #2, and thus did not know F. Fell would be out of NYC until February 7. Actually Jane’s letter #4 was never answered by mail. It was discussed in the telephone call between Jane and F. Fell on February 8. This is the call discussed in the notes on page 269 of the 232nd session. [...]

[...] The letter was answered by telephone in the call of February 8, between Jane and F. Fell. [...] The “meeting” grows out of Mr. Fell’s reference that in this telephone call of February 8, he felt he was getting acquainted with Jane as a person, meeting her personally; also that he looked forward to their meeting in May.

(Today is Day 3 of Jane’s new routine, following the session on February 1. She said she catches herself all the time getting off the track, then tries to remind herself of her new healthier goals — living in the moment, thinking positively, and so on.

[...] She started reading the key session for February 1. Again she did well. [...]

[...] I felt sure the temperature was connected to the session for February 1, though I couldn’t say why.

FEBRUARY 4, 1984
4:26 P.M. SATURDAY

FEBRUARY 14, 1973

(This material is from the 640th session for February 14, 1973.

FEBRUARY 11, 1974

(The following material is taken from the 681st session for February 11, 1974.

[...] Last Christmas he arranged for me to have a show of paintings at Harris Hill Inn, just outside Elmira, in February 1965. [...] It opened on February 2,1965, and on the following Sunday, February 7, Jane and I were guests at the Inn, to discuss the show with anyone interested.

[...] The number 3,” refers we believe to the notice for the show, printed in the local paper on February 6,1965. It was a two-column notice with a heavy black border, and stated that I would be at the show on February 7,1965, from 1 to 3 PM.

[...] A connection with a February event. [...]

[...] On February 7 Jane and I spent several hours at the Inn, seated on straight backed chairs at a dining table, ready to answer questions from all and sundry.

FEBRUARY 18, 1974

(The following material is taken from the 683rd session for February 18, 1974.

(While I was typing up this material on February 25, Jane got the translation of the Sumari I wrote her at the end of the statement of February 24. [...]

(February 24, 1972. Thoughts—after the 3 sessions here in Marathon, of February 16, 19, and 21, it finally dawns on me—I finally put the material in the sessions together—and realize that a more basic quality behind Jane’s symptoms is repression. [...]

FEBRUARY 24, 1972 THURSDAY 8:50 PM

[...] February 24, 1972, Marathon, Florida. [...]

(Since she had no session from yesterday to read, Jane tried to read the session for February 1 — the one that led to her Day 1, 2, 3 program. [...] Then I read her the session for February 5 — equally good. [...]

(“I can’t believe that we can’t find ten minutes a day to go over that session for February 1,” I said, “even if we have to give up watching some TV. [...]

FEBRUARY 14, 1984
4:32 P.M. TUESDAY

[...] I added that I was trying to avoid projecting any hassles with Dreams into the future, in line with the session for the day before [February 1], though I was aware that some of what I was saying contradicted elements of that session. [...]

(Jane wants me to note that this is Day 2 of her new approach to life, based on the session for February 1. I do think the session is an excellent one, and I’ve copied it for use at the house, too.)

FEBRUARY 3, 1984
4:03 P.M. FRIDAY

(This session is a continuation of those for February 16 and February 19. [...]

FEBRUARY 21, 1972 MONDAY 9:43 PM

[...] February 21, 1972, Marathon, Florida. [...]

[...] (On February 19.) What was said should show you that Ruburt’s condition also became the focus of your combined discontents, the physical picture of it. [...]

(“Some connection with a February event.” Wendell’s letter of May 26 was in answer to a letter I wrote him last February. I do not have a copy of my letter, but am sure it was written in February because Wendell discusses my references to snow and poor weather. Our weather last winter was quite peculiar—we had no snow at all until the massive three-day storm of February 1, one of the worst in local history. Seth has more to say about February in answer to my first question.

(First Question: What’s that connection with a February event? “I am not sure, though the number 17 seems connected to it, or 14, between the 14th and the 17th of February.” As explained, the object for tonight contained a letter written by Wendell Crowley in answer to my letter of last February. My letter could well have been written between February 14 and 17.

[...] (Pause.) Some connection with a February event. [...]

(“What’s that connection with a February event?”)

(On Friday at 1 PM on February 5, my father died. The funeral was on Monday, February 8 in Tunkhannock, PA. [...]

[...] The first on Tuesday, February 9 concerns my shaky hand and my father. The second on the morning of Wednesday, February 10 concerns Jane’s condition and my part in it, etc. [...]

FEBRUARY 10, 1971

(This is the regularly scheduled session for February 10, 1971. [...]

(My suspicion is that her cold-and-other symptoms mean that we’ve set up some resistance on the part of her psyche since she initiated the Day 1 program on February 2. Today is Day 18 of the program. [...]

(4:28 p.m. “I suppose that means I’m to read you the session for February 1 again,” I said. [...]

FEBRUARY 19, 1984
4:23 P.M. SUNDAY

FEBRUARY 13, 1974

(The following material is taken from the 682nd session for February 13, 1974.

FEBRUARY 4, 1974 12:02 AM

(This material is deleted from the 679th session for February 4, 1974. [...]

FEBRUARY 7, 1965 APPROX. [...]

(February 1, Monday, 11:30 AM: I heard voices but forgot most of them. [...]

(February 8, Monday, 11:30 AM: Good state achieved. [...]

(February 5, Friday, While getting supper in the kitchen this evening, I heard Lee Wright’s voice, although I could not understand what he said. [...]

[...] The month of February was mentioned; and in February she signed the papers putting the child up for adoption. [...]