“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(10:48.) In that case, you see, there would be in another reality a carpenter or his equivalent with a latent love of words, unexpressed — and that individual would then begin to develop; reading books on how to write, perhaps, and taking up a hobby that would allow him to express in words his love of the land and its goods. [...]

[...] I’m expressing contradictory beliefs, obviously, but it seems unlikely that I can use my abilities in such a fashion, even though I tell myself I’d like to.

[...] On her own, Jane expressed concern about secondary personalities in Chapter 6 of The Seth Material; see her account of our meetings with Dr. Instream. [...]

[...] As the sessions became part of our joint reality, we gradually came to understand that the illness I struggled with was a disguised expression of rebellion for both of us. [...]

(Her manner had been quite active and expressive during delivery, her eyes open more often than not. [...]

[...] The boat and water part of this data refers to our Water Street address on the letter used as object; on past occasions Seth has expressed an interpretation of the Water Street address in this way.

[...] You certainly all have dismal and droll expressions this evening. [...]

It expresses your fears that the house traps you, and it is a turnabout. [...]

[...] These are but terms to express the part of you that cannot be seen or touched. [...]

[...] It is expressed in some reality system. [...]

[...] She delivered this material with some groping for the right words, evidently, and used many facial expressions and hand gestures as she did so. [...]

[...] In a creative individual, some of this information might be symbolically expressed in a painting or other work of art.

[...] In both letters #1 and #4, Jane expresses her willingness to do all she can to help with publicity re the ESP book—write copy, appear on radio or TV shows, etc. [...]

[...] Presumably Seth refers to the writings she has sent out recently. Her publisher, F. Fell, has written expressing interest in her book on the Seth material and on the poetry book described in the 232nd session, page 269. [...]

[...] He has quite often expressed a desire to witness a session. [...]

[...] Seth said there was no cause for surprise here, that young people are intuitively aware of much more than one gives them credit for, and that when Jane and I meet young people who express interest we should help them by recommending books, giving our own ideas, etc.

[...] My prose expression was nothing like my own, childish in fact. [...]

[...] There are various schools and religions that try to express the self’s validity, but their distortions have smothered the basic authenticity of the teachings.

Neither house expresses your own particular individualistic ways of life, of course, but each one comes close enough to intrigue you, and either one could be made to suit your purposes quite easily. [...]

[...] While Dunne and Priestley and myself used different terms often to express the same concept, we also differ in many respects as far as these theories are concerned. My third undifferentiated layer, you see, would correspond to the consciousness of Priestley’s third time, which is why I can tell you that at that point individuality is indeed maintained, and personality continues.