“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I hope however to present, along with my explanations, certain hints and clues that will show you where to look for subjective evidence. [...]

[...] Jane:] Part of me feels that the symptoms are an acceptable even ingenious way of seeing that distractions are cut to a minimum; to focus my abilities, like a kid getting a cold to stay in, but more sophisticated, cuts through the necessity for explanations, etc. [...]

[...] I want to give you an explanation of that dream.

[...] I did believe that there was an explanation possible other than distortion however.

[...] We had no idea that it was actually a highly simplified explanation, cleverly geared to our own level of understanding at the time. [...]

[...] The limitations of verbal communications make some explanations difficult. [...]

[...] Lengthy explanations were required and I did not record them; the Gallaghers said they would write out the data for us upon receipt of a copy of the impressions, so the material can be included with this record.

Your own explanation of events from our material, as understood by you, will also now be of important import, as you express them to Ruburt during uneasy times. [...]

[...] Not that I don’t think Prentice owes us some explanations, for they do—especially since they told us nothing of any plans, good or not so good. [...]

[...] Strangely I had never asked Seth for an explanation, so now I made it a point to remark that I hoped he would deal with it this evening. [...]

[...] See the 191st session for Seth’s explanation of why the voice grows so much stronger at times.

Amid her incessant questioning as to who or what Seth is—even if he is a master event!—and amid her concerns about leading others astray, Jane added to her journal four days later: “The worst explanation for Seth that I can imagine is that he is the part of me that I can’t express otherwise—making a psychological statement. [...]

People can become quite frightened, then, of any kind of experiences of a personal nature that imply reincarnational life, for they are then faced with the taboos of science, or perhaps by the distorted explanations of some religions or cults. [...]

“He began to search actually from childhood in a natural fashion toward some larger framework that would offer an explanation for reality, that bore at least some resemblance to the natural vision of his best poetry. [...]

[...] [Ruburt’s] sinful-self explanation represents a fascinating psychological document in that regard, and also shows the self’s mobility and willingness to learn and change—once the intent is made to take a stand.

What you experienced is rather difficult to explain until we have a thorough discussion of the inner senses, but I will give you a simple explanation for now. [...]

[...] I intend to tie this in for you later with a clearer explanation as to how you on your plane form your own camouflage universe, and to elucidate on the fact that form is not rigid, though it appears to be in many cases on your own plane.

These events may be quite different indeed, and the separate interpretations make quite valid explanations of separate variations. [...]

Ruburt’s explanation of the table was correct. [...]

This needs brief explanation. [...]

An introductory chapter may give explanations as to how the material came about and continues. [...]

[...] (Seth added by way of explanation, etc.

[...] What was the explanation? [...]