“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] In his own new book (Politics) Ruburt has his personal way of explaining what he is experiencing, and since he shares the same reality with you, then you will be able to relate — perhaps better, even — to his explanations than to mine.

(Louder, humorously:) End of explanation.

[...] I mean it kindly, for you have no idea of the difficulties involved in explaining time to someone who must take time to understand the explanation.

[...] He was saved, so it seemed, from endless explanations; so with a kind of psychological economy that worked far too well for a time the symptoms served to keep him writing at his desk, to regulate the flow of psychic activity, making sure of its direction, and to provide a suitable social reason to refrain from activities that might distract him—from tours or shows, and also even from any onslaught of psychic activity that might follow any unseeming (underlined) spontaneous behavior. [...]

The “natural” subjective experience — the feelings involved — give the opposite explanation. [...]

It is not just that such an inner universe is different from your own, but that any real or practical explanation of its reality would require the birth of an entirely new physics—and such a development would first of all necessitate the birth of an entirely new philosophy. [...]

[...] They have a bedside manner, you see, that I unfortunately seem to lack. (Half humorously.) They do contact other layers of the personality, with explanations that are vital. [...]

I only want to add a few simple explanations here. [...]

(For a full explanation of the implications above, see the 46th session, page 35. [...]

We are dealing here principally, and in the main, with the essence of action, and essentially all apparent divisions are arbitrary for the sake of explanation. [...]

I do regret not discussing your experiences, since I know you were looking forward to their explanation. [...]

[...] You have made certain divisions because of your myths, of course, that make this kind of explanation extremely important and difficult. [...]

With the vision came its explanation. [...]

(With this explanation, I didn’t feel it necessary to ask Seth about the experience. [...]

[...] You will be able to understand the explanations for some of your experiences much better with this material as a background.

[...] The material I am giving now will attempt some explanation of those deeper issues.

[...] I will attempt a simplified explanation then. [...]

In order to rationalize, this personality and all personalities, to give to the present identity a more or less logical explanation for a symptom that is of past origin, the personality will bring forth an actual incident which can then be pointed at by the personal subconscious as a scapegoat.

[...] As he quite humorously commented in the 14th session for January 8, 1964: “… for you have no idea of the difficulties involved in explaining time to someone who must take time to understand the explanation.” [...]

(We preferred not to go, but took the ticket to avoid explanations, without making promises. [...]

Give us a moment here, to make some explanations clear.

We are going about this explanation in our own way; Ruburt and I have a pact, now, of which he is not consciously aware, and if I observe certain niceties or conventions, which I am perfectly willing to accept, then he lets me through. [...]