“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This is a very simplified explanation, for you are not ready to study the reality of multidimensional personality thoroughly. [...]

[...] There is room in it for a rather complete explanation of the mind’s associative processes. [...]

[...] The explanation is a good possible one; however, it is often the only one that would be considered.

[...] In another, he presents some new material on the “original planetary system,” and in answer to a friend’s question, he begins an explanation of the perception of a fetus. [...]

[...] That will do for explanation, I believe.

Once said, the explanation will certainly seem obvious. [...]

[...] Recently we received an excellent, rather lengthy paper about our work in which the writer, a psychologist, discussed among other things the import of Seth’s material, as well as various explanations of his origin. [...]

(After an explanation and discussion of Alpha I, Jane had the class do it after which Seth came through.)

This is not simple to explain, yet I would do poorly by you if I left you with a simple explanation. [...]

(Pause at 10:07.) The term schizophrenia, with the authority of psychology, becomes a mass coverall in which the integrity of personal meaning is given a mass, generalized explanation. [...]

The others present will always remember what happened here, and my explanation was a necessity if the affair was to be successfully concluded.

[...] The impulse to cancel may or may not seem to have an acceptable, rational explanation; that is, for no seeming reason, the individual may simply, impulsively, feel a premonition. [...]

[...] Often both of us gave information in some sessions, but I did not believe that you were ready for any deep explanations. [...]

[...] I didn’t know what to think of this explanation at the time. [...]

[...] It happened to be a session night night anyway, and without being asked, Seth suspended dictation on his own book to give us the following explanation:

[...] See that session for an explanation of the personal meaning this symbol has for us. [...]

I am making this discussion as simple as possible, and using the conscious self simply because less difficulties are presented in explanation. [...]

Now, one brief explanation here, for this sort of thing operates in good as well as poor circumstances. [...]

[...] See page 149-150 for an explanation of the circumstances surrounding the questions sent to Jane by Pat Norelli’s friend Roger.

[...] This caused him to think of our sessions in stereotyped ways, putting an either-or aspect to our relationship, and closing his mind to my own explanation of my existence.

[...] Now, this is only a partial, very partial, explanation for something that you are. [...]

[...] Through one of these, Seth added in a very simplified explanation, he could enter within the limits of Jane’s “psychic comprehension.”