“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] All you have to do to please me is work a reasonable amount of hours daily; then I do not care what you do, but I expect that purpose to govern and direct your lives to be the focus about which all other events happen, not a sideline.

Up to now you both have been playing the illness game strongly, in your imagination both creating symptoms, imprisoning Ruburt within them in the present, seeing them in the future, and examining future events in the light of present symptoms.

[...] I will also prove it even in so far as the so-called aging of rock formations and other archeological events are concerned. [...]

[...] Others were valid subjective events of a different kind, and the entire production was in response to my suggestions for a mood-changing dream.

[...] There would be reprecussions, however, that would be unavoidable, [for again, basically, the personality does not differentiate between sleeping and waking events].

[...] You cannot manipulate events for egotistical purposes. You can manipulate events and you can manipulate them for your own egotistical purposes; but when you do so, you give yourself a traffic ticket. [...]

(Seth also notes a few other discrepancies, later in the session, between the actual dream events and my written account.)

[...] We cannot be sure without Seth’s help, but this data does fit the events of that evening as described to us by Tom himself and others.

[...] February 9, and of my waking experience the next evening.¹ Both events had involved intense perceptions of color and/or light, and I’d told Jane that anything Seth cared to say about them would be most welcome. [...]

[...] And neither of you would have agreed to the separation nor would the separation have taken place until both of you realized that it was time for this event to occur. [...]

[...] All of us expected an easygoing session — one that might touch upon current events involving the three of us, from a very ill feline, say, to our impromptu Friday evening “reincarnational dramas.” [...]

[...] You will know, for instance, when the remembered event and imagination intersect with another probability. [...]

[...] Part of this experience includes a natural fascination with exterior events. [...]

[...] You have not completely introduced your inner image, but only hinted at it, so that to her it is secondary and unreal, when she is faced by actual events in which you behave as the inner image, she is bewildered, confused, and imagines that you are demented.

[...] There are events that unite us and that have served as turning points in the development of our various personalities. [...]

[...] We will fill in our outline of past events as our time permits.

[...] The act of perception itself helps form the perceived event and is a part of it.”

[...] Only I keep groping … and sensing events that my own reality can’t really understand.

[...] I also decided that I wasn’t going to get excited about it in any event. [...]

There is an emotional bond that is important in the setting up of such contacts, and what is clear in such clairvoyance may take in certain objects or situations that are perceived, not because of their logical cohesion, but events or situations which the emotional bond makes significant.

Both events are important—the death of his father and the mailing of the book. [...]

[...] This was merely to remind you of certain continuities without going over events already mentioned—so going back to the point in time mentioned earlier in tonight’s session: when Dialogues was finished Ruburt tried it out on Prentice, and felt briefly that Tam might take it. [...]