“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] She’s reread all of the experiences several times so far, and has made a few additional notes about the March 8 event in particular.

In medieval times to be excommunicated was no trivial incident, but an event harkening severance that touched the soul, the body, and all political, religious and economic conditions by which the two were tied together. [...]

[...] (Long pause.) It pierces, opening up dimensions through which the consciousness can then perceive events or on occasion travel through the dimension to experience the events more directly.

[...] When it did, Seth followed the nonbook portion of the last session so well that we want to include it in Mass Events. [...]

[...] And all of these portraits are alive and interacting, and as they interact they form the planetary, mass social and political events of your world.

[...] In the past two days the following events have occurred. [...]

Both of you distrusted those events. [...]

[...] Though it seems to you that reincarnational existences involve past and future events, they are existences parallel or adjacent to your own present life and consciousness. [...]

[...] All psychological events affect all others.

(John Bradley was a witness to the session, and had some questions about his job with Searle, and events within the company. [...]

Events as you know of them right now are transient. [...]

(11:14.) In your mind, therefore, see those probable abilities or events taking place. [...]

8. I began these notes several weeks after the 732nd session was held, so that I had some camouflage time to sort out events, and to let others happen.

[...] It was Sue who verified that several months ago Peter had described to her what he now felt to be the same psychic event I’d tuned in to just a few weeks ago (on December 3, 1974) — only Peter’s experience had taken place in 1967! [...]

[...] The next night Seth began discussing that psychic event in the 598th session. [...]

[...] Seth delivered much material about reincarnation, including “the time of choosing” between lives, recreating and changing events in past lives, and past and present reincarnational family relationships; probabilities; dreams; the fetus, and so forth.

[...] While I drove us back to our apartment house for supper we discussed the incredibly complicated roles and events surrounding those different kinds of organizations — whereupon Jane came up with a most apt phrase: “The genealogy of events….” She laughed, then added: “As families of people have their genealogies, so do families of events.”⁴

[...] This included data on my starting to take violin lessons when I was eight years old — an event I hadn’t thought of for what seemed to be decades [it took place in 1927], but which I was able to instantly recall as soon as Jane mentioned it.)

[...] An ideal represents events that do not as yet exist in fact. [...]

[...] They were also innovative, in their terms, in the publishing of material before the current interest in unofficial events.

[...] The dreams were meant to encourage him and to show him that the inner order of events does assure his improvements.

The promise in the dream made by you, that the events (of Jane’s great flexibility)were indeed happening, represented your inner knowledge that he would make it now, and his own realization of the fact, as well as the body’s acknowledgment. [...]

Symbolically, however, the crucifixion idea itself embodied deep dilemmas and meanings of the human psyche, and so the Crucifixion per se became a far greater reality than the actual physical events that occurred at the time.

Christ knew however, clairvoyantly, that these events in one way or another would occur, and the probable dramas that could result. [...]

[...] There was no clothing to decorate the mechanisms of events. [...]

[...] Now she told me that Seth introduced the subject in that manner so that later she’d be more at ease dealing with it for Mass Events.

[...] Since many of them are unaware of your idea of time, they would find it difficult to understand that you perceive events with intervals between, and would not perceive the inner organization that you thrust upon your normal environment. [...]

(Bill Ward’s letter accompanying the artwork mentioned his recent attendance at a dinner gathering of many of the group of friends we worked with in the early 1940’s. Oddly enough, the last letter I received from Wendell Crowley, in May 1966, also described a similar event.)

A connection with a particular event that was social. [...]

(“A connection with a particular event that was social. [...]

(Note that in here Seth gives three blocks of data relating to one facet of the events connected to the bill used as object. [...]

[...] You both felt an honest and deep compassion for other people, however: even winning in a sports event, you felt sorry for the loser. [...]

[...] The event reinforced much of the material in the session itself, and my idea that had brought it about: As Jane and I were finishing supper last night Tom D’Orio from Binghamton visited us with two of his friends [they had a small Seth group going at home]. [...]

[...] [Earlier Monday night, before the session, I’d asked Jane how one could “be a child again,” while retaining the valuable elements from the subsequent events in life, but keeping that original clarity and simplicity of vision.] I’d been thinking primarily of painting. [...]

[...] With you and another man, and some connection with the date 1 1492, perhaps leading to an historical event.

(“and some connection with the date 1 1492, perhaps leading to an historical event.” [...]

(The word “museum" has historical connotations, and the Kecks deal with old paintings, often of historic interest, so Jane is correct when she asserts that old paintings such as those the Kecks handled while in Elmira in August 1964, are also historical events.

Any event that you would consider disastrous to your race, brought about by the race itself, would be used in another probable system to avoid the same sort of error. [...]

[...] We had wondered what course the entities would take who had manifested on our particular probability-earth, in the event of its literal destruction.)

[...] How is the entity that is about to manifest part of itself through Sue [who is due to give birth in a few weeks], preparing for the event and experience?”

[...] The two separate mentions of the same date did refer to two separate events that would occur on that same day.

[...] Earlier today, rereading the 54th session, page 90, she had made the intuitive connection that Seth’s referral to the day May 23 twice did indeed refer to two separate events. [...]

[...] We have had no trouble that I am aware of in clearing up any distortions we ask Seth about after the event.

Disconnected from their usual daily attraction to physical events, your emotions will often form their own landscapes, utilizing dreams as their creative medium. [...]