“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Now the same is true of other portions of your entity, if you consider any other given portion as being the vortex of its own circle. [...]

Our contacts now are not just contacts with Robert F. Butts and Jane Roberts, and that is why I have always used your entity names. [...]

The circle image that I gave you is meant to represent the basic meaning of each individual’s entity. [...]

“The present individual in any given life could be called a fragment of his entire entity, having all the properties of the original entity, though they remain latent or unused. [...] This type of personality fragment is of different origin than your friend, who is himself a fragment of his own entity. [...]

[...] The type of fragment your friend saw was of this type, but so disconnected from your friend, and so absentmindedly was it sent upon its travels, that its information was probably passed directly to the entity which your friend represents. [...]

(I found myself wondering how it was possible for Jane to be speaking for Seth, while at the same time being aware of Seth’s entity. I was not sure if this is quite the same situation that has prevailed in the past when Jane has spoken for both Seth and his entity during the same session.)

(This was a surprise, and it took me a moment to realize that Seth was referring to his own larger personality, his entity as we call it, and for whom Jane has occasionally spoken in a much different voice. [...]

(When she could finally talk Jane revealed that she had been experiencing a concept to accompany the personality’s words; this she has done before when speaking for Seth’s entity, and we have been told before that this is one of the reasons or purposes for her speaking for this new personality. [...]

(When Seth tells me I’ve done a Speaker’s portrait, I translate this to mean that I’ve tuned-in on but one personality out of the very many making up that Speaker’s entity.

[...] The whole self or entity or soul can never be completely materialized in three-dimensional form. [...]

The entity sees the whole event, the whole person-event, with the time element, or age in your terms, as simply another characteristic or dimension. [...]

(In the 54th session Seth went into considerable detail in explaining the construction of entities. [...] As everything else does, entities constantly change. [...]

(Mark is Bill Macdonnel’s entity name.)

[...] Frank Watts, it will be remembered, was our communicator; the present Seth entity did not announce his presence until the 4th session, when he superseded Frank Watts.

(Seth then continued to explain how I am also an offshoot of that early Seth entity. [...]

[...] From scatterings of data Seth had given in the past I thought Jane’s eyes, even though wide open, did not see others present as they were, as physical entities, but perhaps as electromagnetic personalities.

[...] I am aware of you as human forms and physical entities. [...]

I am aware of you myself as electromagnetic and psychic entities. [...]

(Smile.) This is a tricky method, and I can enjoy seeing you in your terms as material entities, for Ruburt’s system is carrying the prominent spot, and I use it.

[...] It is concerned with the entity’s innate working knowledge of the basic vitality of the universe, without which no manipulations of vitality would be possible—as, for example, you could not stand up straight without first having an innate sense of balance.

[...] A personality may “originally” be a part of a given entity, and on its own develop interests quite different. It can on its own take a lonely way, or it can instead attach itself or gravitate toward other entities with interests like its own. [...]

(“Number fifty-three: In the 429th session for August 14, 1968, you said that some personalities can be a part of more than one entity.”)

Those who have left it have evolved into the mental entities that they always were, you see. [...] This group of entities still takes a great interest in earth. [...]

[...] Each entity who is born in flesh works toward the development of those abilities that can be best nurtured and fulfilled within the physical environment. [...]

[...] Our fine friend (Orville Tigerman): A-I-N-E-I-D—that is his entity name, and I send him my heartiest regards.

I can see that my analogy comparing the soul to an organ within a multidimensional psychic structure of the entity is confusing you. [...]

As earlier mentioned (at 10:20 in the 637th session), and simply following the analogy, each self has its own soul within the oversoul, and the oversoul is itself a part of the entity’s multidimensional structure.

[...] For the inner self is, after all, composed of mental actions, and the entity itself is everchanging.

[...] There is constant give and take between all portions of the self, and the entity changes as it interacts with other levels of the personality. [...]

[...] He was of an ancient entity, and you have known him in other lives. [...]

[...] He is an entity older than you, and he has tried to point the way to you.

[...] (Philip is John’s entity name according to Seth.) The trouble that you have is of your own making.

[...] Ruburt is Seth’s entity name for her. [...]

[...] There are probable gods as there are probable men; but these probable gods are all a part of what you may call the soul of, or the identity of, All That Is; even as your probable selves are all a portion of your soul or entity.

[...] They become quite independent psychic entities, validities in other levels of existence. [...]

(When Jane did begin to speak at 9:11, she used the same high, somewhat distant and quite precise voice as before, the one belonging to what we call, somewhat inaccurately, Seth’s entity. [...]

(Jane said that when she speaks for Seth’s entity “it’s like I’m emptying myself out up there someplace,” and that when Seth speaks “he fills me up.” [...]

(I also wanted to ask Seth just how we would know the presence of his entity, but did not interrupt since Seth seemed to want to keep speaking.)

You (to Rose) are a young entity. [...] You are a very young entity and frisky! [...]

Now, again in those terms, he is an entity who appears time and time again within your physical system, but he has been recognized on only two occasions. [...] He was not one personality, as I have told you, but a highly developed entity, sometimes appearing as a fragment of himself.

The entities, like master memory cells, store knowledge of its, or their, gestalt personalities; and even these entities are often split in many pieces, and each segment retains the complete data that belonged to the original entity.

[...] Jane is not Seth now, he states, not his subconscious mind; nevertheless Jane’s entity Ruburt is, now, an extension and materialization of the Seth that he was at one time, centuries ago. [...]

[...] You are a part of a larger self, an entity, and because you are there is a portion of you that has access to the knowledge of your entity.

[...] Here I am saying that the atoms and molecules themselves, because of their characteristics, not only deal with probabilities within the body’s cellular structure, but also helps the body make predictive judgments about entities or objects outside of itself.

[...] Cells, as entities, do not drop off [the physical form] like apples. [...]