“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] (Pause.) The entire Catholic dogma is built about Christ’s agony and death. [...]

This book however will also point out the truths that do exist within the tattered garments of organized established religions; rip apart the crumbling fabric of dogma to the body of revelationary knowledge that was always there.

[...] But the incident made me think that it’s a pity nursing students aren’t taught valid facts of life, instead of the medical dogmas that often prolong illness. [...]

[...] I agree wholeheartedly with the concepts Seth presents here, while realizing that they run counter to many accepted religious, social, and scientific dogmas. [...]

[...] If this book “works,” then many old questions will be seen as relatively meaningless, formed not after any intimate encounter with basic issues, but in response to old dogmas.

[...] Now, you have always been involved with churches, and you are only now learning to relieve inner truths outward without dogma. [...]

(Pause at 11:00.) Trust no person who tells you that you are evil or guilty by reason of your nature or your physical existence, or any such dogma. [...]

[...] You may assign them to “spirits” or disembodied personalities, but in such a way that these are thrown together in a confusing mass of dogma or superstition.

Look at it this way: If someone tells you that pleasure is wrong and tolerance is weakness, and that you must follow this or that dogma blindly in obedience, and if you are told this is the only right road toward the idealized good, then most likely you are dealing with a fanatic. [...]

[...] Natural “mystical” experience, unclothed in dogma, is the original religious therapy that is so often distorted in ecclesiastical organizations, but it represents man’s innate recognition of his oneness with the source of his own being, and of his own experience.

Ruburt found great comfort in the church as a young person, for if it created within its members the image of a Sinful Self, it also of course provided a steady system of treatment—a series of rituals that gave the individual some sense of hope the Sinful Self could be redeemed, as in most of Christianity’s framework through adherence to certain segments of Christian dogma. [...]

[...] (Pause.) That result was the inevitable follow-up of dogma. [...]

[...] Surely Jane feels the necessity to turn aside from the selected dogmas of our time. [...]

[...] He was, in fact, quite daring in refusing to accept the conventional spirit-guide dogma—which would at least have given him a kind of psychological covering (all emphatically. [...]

[...] Then: “I guess it’s me —but write this down, if I can get it quickly enough—about creativity and dogma. [...]

[...] This means that it usually ends up as either nonsense or armored dogma.

[...] His parents’ brand of religion was a sort of social Protestantism, rather delightfully innocent of dogma. [...]

Dogmas or systems of thought that tell you to rise above your emotions can be misleading — even, in your terms, somewhat dangerous. [...]

[...] Many religious dogmas consider such conditions, again, the result of a god’s punishment. [...]

[...] It may involve denial, where you refuse to accept the visions or dogmas of others in order to more clearly perceive and form your own.

[...] You break away from self-adopted restrictions, and you grow spiritually as you learn to step aside from limiting conceptions and dogmas.