“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Note that Jane doesn’t distinguish between singular and plural here—one of the points I hoped would be brought out in the experiment.

(A note: Jane doesn’t like to take pills. [...]

[...] Portions of her are still quite deliberately thinking it all over, I’m sure, although she doesn’t mention this outside the session frameworks she provides for Seth and herself.

[...] I deeply believe that her psyche would insist that she doesn’t need any sort of basic protection by me (or anyone else) to begin with—only understanding. [...]

[...] 2. This insight led Jane to an obvious one neither of us had ever made before: that when she gets a letter in which the writer threatens suicide if Jane doesn’t help him or her, this is like Marie threatening the young Jane that she will commit suicide.)

[...] I didn’t realize last year of course that she was so dissatisfied with the psychic image and the books; I blithely assumed that she felt she was doing good work, and that she accepted it, which doesn’t mean that I had any thoughts of ever saying she shouldn’t do any other kind of writing, ever. [...]

This doesn’t mean that in the interim you allow every negative thought freedom however. [...]

[...] It doesn’t sound right.”

[...] If you find yourself in physical difficulties healthwise, you cannot say: “Why doesn’t my body stop me and assert its own wisdom?” because in the truest sense there is no division between your thoughts and your body. [...]

[...] (What if one doesn’t want a probable reality they choose? [...]

[...] She doesn’t want to use the concept as a crutch; her caution stems from other beliefs, on which I’ll quote her shortly. [...]

At this time Jane doesn’t know just how, or to what extent, hallucination was involved in any of these episodes, if at all; sometimes the dream state definitely was. [...]

[...] Last name is Repanshek; but there is a puzzle here, since the name doesn’t seem to be an Italian one. [...]

[...] As I told Jane after the session, I realized that Prentice-Hall’s treatment of our books reflects our own ambiguous attitudes-—we want her books to be well known, but don’t want to get involved in the process personally—but, perversely, that doesn’t stop me from getting mad at Prentice-Hall, even if they are doing what we want them to. [...]

(“I think such connective sessions happen between book sessions, for a change of pace — where material doesn’t have to fit a more concentrated overall book focus. [...]

[...] But Jane doesn’t yet have one she likes.

([Gert:] “It doesn’t mean, say, a deeper trance?”)

[...] The Gallaghers came to mind now as we discussed this, but she doesn’t know why. [...]

[...] “Our society doesn’t suspect any of this. [...]

[...] Seth doesn’t answer mail though, or do any typing, and so as a result of those trance hours Rob and I spend a good deal of our conscious energy dealing one way or another with the effects of that trance life.

[...] After all, I said, people come to her for help, she doesn’t go to them. [...]

(“Why doesn’t he want to go out?”)

[...] I had to read the manuscript to find out what was in it, for example; and to that extent the book doesn’t seem mine. [...]

[...] But an interesting point came out as we talked: Jane doesn’t experience that strong nostalgia when she finishes one of her “own” books.