“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

While the speaker, or speaker-system, necessarily loses many meanings, the very distortions that do occur make the messages decipherable. [...]

[...] To have attempted to censor Seth since 1963, say, to “keep him to ourselves” on that particular subject, would have long ago turned into an impossibly complicated and dishonest task: Jane and I would have become involved in a constant distortion of his material as we rewrote the sessions. [...]

Your ideas of the history of your species, then, are largely distorted versions of the latest chapter, in those terms.

[...] The religions, in one way or another, have always perceived it, although the attempt to interpret that reality in terms of the recognized facts of the world is bound to distort it.

[...] It is also true that in the deepest terms you have not developed your reasoning, so that your version of it is bound to result in some distortions.

[...] When Ruburt hampers it by trying to make it too specific, and ties it into distorted ideas of work, then divisions occur that need not occur.

[...] Eastern religions are the only ones that even remotely try to approach such a principle, and they do so in highly distorted fashions. [...]

[...] It developed that some of this material was distorted.)

[...] The twisting was distortive, having to do with the motion of the body. [...]

(“With something beginning with an M, and something beginning with a G,” We didn’t know, although we speculated that the initials were a distortion of Miss Callahan, or of Merry Christmas, both these ideas being related to the source of the poinsettia plant which furnished the leaves as objects. [...]

There was a visual distortion. [...]

4. This material reminds me of Seth in the 681st session in Volume 1: “The deeper explanations, however [in this case of probabilities], demand a further expansion of ideas of consciousness … It is not so much a matter of Ruburt’s vocabulary, incidentally, since even a specialized scientific one would only present these ideas in its own distorted fashion. [...]

Certain presentations in Appendix 18 contain information from Seth about the distortive effects caused by words as he communicates through Jane. [...]

[...] It is intellectual, yet carries the underlaying thrust of emotional hope—the distorted voice of the beleaguered, weary, ironic idealists.

Within their happening there may be a distorted — to it — grotesque duration in which action may be seemingly impossible. [...]

(Smile:) I am quite aware of the distorted religious connections made here: Die to yourself and you will be reborn; you will not kill yourself. [...]

[...] Jane caught herself at once, she now said, in order to prevent possible distortions growing out of this thought. [...]

You were dealing, indeed, with a legitimate perception into a dimension outside of the ones with which you are familiar, and with a distortion of a sort on your part, as once again you attempted to translate inner data into a form that could be perceived by the physical senses.

[...] Ruburt is concerned lest this is distorted, because of Miss Callahan’s bad eye, but the information is quite legitimate. [...]

[...] Seth might have been spoofing us a bit, or it could be a slight distortion. [...]

[...] Obviously, you think, there is subconscious distortion here.

[...] She said she could feel Seth pushing at her to get her to let the material through as clearly as possible, “without distorting it out of all recognition.”

[...] The outward manifestations given to the masses of the people became so distorted, however, that the original unity of the religion finally decayed.

Last night our friend, Joseph, had a dream experience that intrigued him, and yet seemed highly distorted. [...]

[...] Despite distorted versions of that last statement, however, there is still obviously a distinct difference, say, between the thought of adultery and its physical expression.

The image in the doorway is indeed my own, though there is bound to be a distortion in Mark’s perception of me. [...]

These very often distort inner data so that unreliable and even loathsome constructions are formed. [...]

[...] Nevertheless, it contains distortions, due to the man’s inability to transmit data in this manner.