“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

There is enough in this session to give you some evocative insights, but the material will be explained in much more detail. [...]

In other sessions I have explained precisely and in detailed fashion the steps by which this individualized vitality forms its own energy into molecules and atoms, which are the basis for further more advanced gestalts. [...]

[...] She saw a mass of buildings in together, close together, and it was difficult to distinguish detail.

[...] The details are not important and need not cost much expense.

[...] There is some application there, but the larger one applies to his own ideas of what someone in his position should (underlined) be doing, and the idealized image is partially a construct to which you also added details unwittingly in the past. [...]

[...] Then I’ll need another week to go over the manuscript, with colored pens marking instructions of each page as to what copy we want set in roman [upright] type, and in italics; while doing that I’ll also check spelling, punctuation, references, dates, times—all of those mundane details so necessary in helping our publisher produce a finished, good-looking book for the marketplace.¹

[...] Before, that intent was diminished as far as its effect was concerned, by your fears, your concern about details, your worries about too many visitors, or demands.

[...] However John gave Jane no details before the session, merely stating that he would like to know what was happening.)

[...] I have discussed in some detail the electrical makeup of the physical body, and of the atoms and molecules, and cells and organs, that compose it.

I do not want to give you too many details too quickly. [...]

[...] You make certain adjustments, perhaps altering particular details, but you step into and become part of the inner processes—affecting, say, the shape or size or nature of the event before it becomes a definite physical actuality.

[...] Jane didn’t ask for details on the case, but instead explained to the lawyer something of Seth’s ideas so that the attorney could use that material in his defense, making it clear that above all Seth was not for violence, even though the prosecuting attorney was evidently trying to make the defendant sound as though it was okay to kill because reincarnation was a fact: Since we all lived other lives, no one could really kill anyone. [...]

[...] Several years ago Seth gave an excellent reading regarding my father, going into more detail on some of the data given here in summary fashion.)

[...] Unless I summon the self that I was at that time, the memories for details are not that clear. [...]

(A note: Beneath a larger agreement, there are many differences in the details of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. [...]

[...] In one way this was a highly stylized art, and yet it allowed for both great preciseness of expression in terms of detail, and great freedom in terms of scope. [...]

It has been truthfully said that the “unconscious” is intimately aware of the most minute details of your health, state of mind, and relationships. [...]

[...] The issue is obviously then clouded by current ones, so that different details in a day can contribute, or serve as triggers. [...]

[...] Ruburt is as “detailed” about his own working habits as you both admit you are in yours. He seems to be in awe, relatively speaking, of your simplified “perfectionist” detailed ways, while to a certain extent you seem to be equally awed by his inspired, undetailed ways — a game each of you plays.

[...] It is meaningless to say that the books are Ruburt’s. Your ideas of “perfection” and love of detail, or if you prefer, your feeling for the significance of detail that appears exteriorized in your notes, is as present in the inner consistency of the material itself as given by me.

[...] We do think that in detail, reincarnation, whether it’s seen in ordinary terms or within the “simultaneous” framework espoused by Seth, can be an endless subject.²⁷

Ruburt keeps track of intuitive details that neither of you are even conscious of, and so there shows an integrity that at least sometimes he is not aware of. [...]

[...] I made a mistake: I should have insisted upon a detailed oral or written account from her, and made my own notes if necessary. [...]

[...] I’d planned a consecutive story line book including some of robs dreams with interpretations yet feel strain there now, showing how this detail or that one fits the picture, this noon it came to me that the approach seemed to rational at this time; i wanted one that was lighter in tone, quicker yet more expansiveso if anything the books technique would be magical itself…. [...]

9. In Psychic Politics, which Prentice-Hall published in 1976, Jane describes in detail how she learned about the many aspects of her psychic library.

[...] As Seth does, they represent one portion of her psyche offering reassurances to another more conscious portion, in our terms; they deal with her questioning of the reality she’s creating in the finest personal detail—her wanting to know why she’s made her choices, her determination to press ahead, her embracing of our beloved earth and our universe. [...]

All of this reminds me that lately the media have carried a number of stories detailing how medical science is not only trying hard to approach cures for scourges like cancer (in cancer’s case, possibly through the exploration and understanding of the role played in the cell nucleus by altered normal cells called oncogenes), but is already claiming to have narrowed down its search to specific genes that affect imponderables like behavior—depression, for example. [...]

[...] The search for detail leads us further away from the larger sensed dimensions in which those facts must lie.

[...] Our own general psychological unease certainly contributed to that failure, but Jane’s writing became bogged down in details about dates, quotations from old sessions, and elaborate studies built upon our dream accounts and other psychic and daily records, for example. [...]