“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I sit in a swivel chair
with smooth ball bearings.
Without warning, I turn myself
around in a complete circle,
but nothing disturbs
my world vision,
and objects appear on all sides
with sweet precision,
as if a projector in my head
sends out invisible rays that turn
into images, so I
always seem inside
dimensions of depth
and weight.

Though I haven’t explored this idea yet at all in depth, I got a feeling that by the time I’d finished Mass Events and my God of Jane I’d come to a point of indecision and perhaps certainly some despondency because I had not resolved the issues. [...]

[...] (With a small laugh:) You are not consciously capable of dealing with the psychological depths and riches that activity reveals. [...]

(9:25.) The states of consciousness merge also one into the other, and it is obvious that I am using the terms of depth to make the discussion easier. [...]

[...] That is, you would perhaps think that a statue would be extremely lifelike because it exists in space and depth, having width and girth. [...]

[...] This will add depth and dimension and vastly increase your own interest. [...]

[...] It did not touch the heights or the depths of human experience. [...]

[...] If the body can only follow certain sequences, still consciousness has inner depths of action that do not show on the surface line of experience. [...]

[...] However we have not begun a study in depth. [...]

[...] Priestley is more correct in depth however, though Dunne goes further, only to peter out. [...]

[...] Now these various times of Priestley’s and Dunne’s have much in common with the planes of which I am speaking in our discussions, and the value fulfillment of our material is akin to Priestley’s insistence on depth within any given moment.

I go into particulars however concerning how this depth is achieved, as you know, if you recall a diagram that I outlined for you concerning moment points in the past.

[...] To date there are eleven of these: Value climate of psychological reality; energy transformation; spontaneity; durability; creation; consciousness; capacity for infinite mobility; law of infinite changeability and transmutation; cooperation; arrival and departure, meaning physical birth and death; and quality depth, the perspective in which an idea can expand, replacing our time and space.)

I have been wanting to speak further concerning the inner ego, for we have not discussed this issue in any depth. [...]

[...] That entire muscular group has been trying to improve itself of late, and at such times Ruburt does feel disoriented with changes in head pressure, balance, depth perception. [...]

[...] The basis for all experience is depth perception, and value fulfillment. [...]

[...] (Pause.) From someone else here… Your figures, to get the feeling of depth and breadth, this is not to get the feeling simply of the flesh and bone within the flesh, but to suggest the personal energy and vitality that is in a riot, to be loose within the flesh.

[...] Or—yes—even religion: a subject I would like to explore in depth if ever I can create the several years of camouflage time necessary to do so. [...] Seth did offer insights, excellent ones of certain very creative depths that we more than welcomed, while all the time being quite aware, I think, that the beautiful young woman through whom he spoke—who let him speak—had her own agenda at the same time. [...]

[...] I humbly submit that somehow, somewhere, there are connections, intuitions, whispers and shouts and facts that proclaim our greater reality’s depth and being, its independence of our ordinary conscious ideas of space and time. [...]

It’s easy to note in retrospect that such remarks were clues, clear indications or projections of at least possible troubles that we needed to explore in depth, but the whole affair with the board was so new to us that in our inexperience we felt no urgency to at least try to do so. [...]

[...] Yet Ruburt and Seth met on certain common grounds that were to be developed in depth over the years. [...]

[...] For I feel now, in connection with the two “new” poems, the same profound sensations I had concerning Jane’s challenges when I wrote in Note 6: “Perhaps it was her poetic art of expression that helped me identify so strongly with her emotions, but I suddenly felt that even I had never really understood the myriad depths of her challenges and her reactions to them.” [...]

[...] The separation process is illusion; nevertheless in this way a depth perception is achieved. [...]

[...] Why isn’t there at least one artist in all of the world painting today whose ability equals Rembrandt’s, and who uses that great gift to evoke the depths of compassion for the human condition as Rembrandt did? [...]

The varying pressure in the joints is also involved here, and all of these issues are connected with depth perception. [...]

(During break Jane mentioned she has no depth perception.)