“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Your technology, however, as it stands, has to some important degree—but not entirely—been based upon a scientific philosophy that denies the very idea of value fulfillment. [...]

[...] But that intent was sabotaged because the philosophy behind it denied the validity of the very subjective values that give man his reason for living. [...]

[...] It can deny feeling, in other words, and even attempt to argue itself out of its present independence from the body.

In periods where no such mass ideas are held, there is more disorientation, and when life after death is completely denied, the problem is somewhat magnified. [...]

[...] Many who make a practice of “denying” negative suggestions from others, asserting positive affirmations instead, actually do so because they are so fully convinced that the power of negative beliefs is stronger than that of beneficial ones.

[...] I said it would be useless to deny the existence of her symptoms. [...]

[...] The fears, denied then, prevented him from further developing abilities and strengths that would automatically conquer the fears, and perceiving experiences that would prove the fears groundless.

The integrity of form is not denied, but is allowed to merge with the greater vitality that gives the form its meaning. [...]

(Jane tried to half-heartedly deny this, without really considering the question, I thought—not that I wanted her to to any great degree before Seth got into it. [...]

[...] He did not deny the fact of your own visually acute behavior. [...]

[...] The part of yourself which you deny understands the inner senses well. [...]

[...] But the worst of fools would not deny psychological experience for this reason.

[...] And the inner data and the inner self which you deny is a lot more permanent, my dear Joseph, and I am speaking to you as proof.

[...] Jane didn’t agree or deny that she’d been worrying. [...]

[...] To deny that is asking too much.

[...] It was not to be denied but put off. [...]

[...] They were not strong enough to deny it entirely, and he was working through them, although this took considerable energy.

[...] Many others, however, choose to deny experience while within the physical system, committing suicide quite as effectively while still physically alive.

[...] I understand that the concept does indeed offend your intellect, and that your senses seem to deny it. [...]

[...] [If I did] then I would be denying you your own power, and therefore seemingly building my own … I am here because I enjoy it. [...]

[...] In other words, I think that ESP abilities are natural ones that we have denied because they seem to contradict our ideas of reality.

[...] The theories expand the meaning of individuality and challenge us to accept the larger self that both science and religion at various times have taught us to deny.

[...] I am not saying that Seth is just a psychological structure allowing me to tune into revelational knowledge, nor denying that he has an independent existence. [...]

[...] However, her statement prompted me to tell her that a few days before the insurance company had denied our claim for major medical benefits because they hadn’t received the hospital records, I’d waked up early one morning and lay there worrying about the possibility of a denial for perhaps an hour. [...]

[...] It simply acts then to familiarize the body with those deep feelings of relaxation that the mind has denied it, and can be an excellent learning process.

Your mother felt that his creativity was a threat to stability, so maintaining your own creativity stubbornly, you still felt to some degree that it was a threat, that it would not pay off, and so you tried to clothe it in the garb of work, effort, regular hours, and stability, and to deny or play down its playful aspects.

You are, however, denying some aspects of your own spontaneity. [...]

[...] Here I started to feel the microscopic nature of our planet, comparatively speaking; a shrinking a momentary sense of desolation that was my own, I think; there was no attempt to deny integrity or uniqueness of physical life; but only to express... [...]

Once they are recognized then they can be met and dealt with, but they cannot be intellectualized away, and denied while smothering them and pretending that they do not exist.

[...] It is most frequently the error of the ego, who upon many occasions attempts to deny its dependency upon this cooperation, that sets up impediments, and sets up countersuggestions that can be somewhat considered cancerous, in that if it had its way the ego would envelop all other aspects of the whole organism, and run riot.

[...] It is only when they are denied that they become explosive or dangerous to the personality. [...]