“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The dangerous psychic explosions that I spoke of as being possible are very real possibilities, and involve even chemical changes in Ruburt’s own body; and I do suggest that you make some changes, either by returning to your regular workroom, Joseph, or by making the porch room into a temporary bedroom. Ruburt is unpredictable so I cannot predict what guise such an explosion might take, but it would be definitely dangerous and strong.

[...] The messages were to the effect that “Ruburt’s psychic energies could be dangerous if he [Jane] does all his living in one room.”

His pent-up feeling could result in rather undisciplined psychic explosions that could be dangerous, though not necessarily so. [...]

I do not believe that there are any more dangers facing us in the interior universe than there are in the physical one. [...]

[...] Traffic noise even at this hour was audible; when I told Seth he was in danger of being drowned out by the traffic noise, the voice immediately rose in strong volume, humorously, for a few sentences: “I will never be drowned out by traffic...” [...]

[...] He said Peggy should surmount the problem setting up the tension in her back, which was leading in turn to the other physical symptoms, for if she did not there was a danger that any habits of rigidity would grow worse in the future. [...]

A certain amount of leeway in space and time lingers, for even biologically the child is innately equipped with a “forevision” that allows it some “unconscious” view of immediate future events that forewarn it, say, of danger. [...]

[...] Yet the adult often fears that any such playful unofficial alteration of consciousness is dangerous, and becomes worried that the imagined situation will supersede the real one.

[...] If the overall developments are not dangerous, I will not automatically sense them, but only the end result. [...]

[...] There is no great danger here, but since you know he is not inoculated, it should be done. [...]

(Our region is supposed to be outside the danger zone — yet we see conflicting newspaper reports about whether the prevailing wind currents would make us vulnerable to the after-effects of a meltdown. [...]

[...] Instantly, probabilities spun out from that dream in all directions, vast potentials and dangers.

There are dangers connected with the last one mentioned, and treacherous currents near the chest. [...]

[...] If you are amid it, in the middle of it or above it, you are in danger. [...]

(Long pause.) Ruburt is in no danger. [...]

[...] Special diets, at particular times, restricted ones, can be of benefit in certain specialized areas of development, but there is always the danger of going overboard.

[...] Usually it means that knowledge itself is somehow dangerous. [...]

A suggestion like: “If you go swimming too soon after lunch, you will drown,” is extremely dangerous, for it predicts behavior of a disastrous nature that would follow almost automatically after the first act is performed. [...]

[...] They see themselves in dangerous predicaments, and then conjure up their own methods of escape. [...]

Instead of such procedures, children are often taught to believe that any situation or illness or danger will worsen, and that the least desirable, rather than the most desirable, solution will be found. [...]

(Our region is supposed to be outside the danger zone—yet we see conflicting newspaper reports about whether the prevailing wind currents would make us vulnerable to the aftereffects of a meltdown. [...]

That insidious mistrust of creative abilities is alarmingly dangerous to the society, and frightening to the individual. [...]

[...] When the child is playing, its sense of joy or anger or danger is very strongly felt. [...]

[...] Like so many others they believe that self-expression is dangerous, evil, and bound to lead to suffering — self-inflicted or otherwise.

There is hardly any danger of that possibility, however, since it would be nearly impossible to perform such a task even with the most developed of technologies — and indeed, the very attempt to do so might well immediately trigger a response on the part of the whole genetic system, so that new divergences appeared with even greater frequency, as compensation.

I repeat, Ruburt is in no danger, but I would also like some of the late sessions reviewed as reinforcement. [...]

[...] When the body is basically held in distrust, however, all such behavior is considered dangerous and suspect. [...]

[...] As I mentioned earlier, in your cases the personality has set up certain safeguards so you will be in no danger. When such safeguards are not erected however, there is some danger. [...]