“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] His rigidity of attitude resulted in a trend for self-destruction, tempered it is true, but dangerous. [...]

He felt danger strongly but could not run, you see. [...]

There is far less danger when his spontaneity overerupts. [...]

[...] These take it for granted that any stressful situation will worsen, that communication with others is dangerous, that self-fulfillment brings about the envy and vengeance of others, and that as individuals they live in an unsafe society, set down in the middle of a natural world that is itself savage, cruel, and caring only for its own survival at any cost.

[...] There are ways of reacting to the dangers of nuclear energy that are far more healthy and beneficial, and we will discuss these later in the book.

Now, if you err, it is far less dangerous to err on the side of spontaneity, given your personalities, than it is to use too much restraint. [...]

[...] It is dangerous to attempt to make the self into what it is not.

[...] For instance: You may at [the age of] three have believed it was dangerous to cross a street. [...] If your mother reinforced this belief telepathically and verbally through dire pictures of the potential danger involved in street crossing, however, then you would also carry within you that emotional fear, and perhaps entertain imaginative considerations of possible accident.

[...] This sharing of mutual ideas not only protects the new offspring from dangers obvious to the parents; it also serves as a framework within which the child can grow.

[...] If such a mother’s imagination followed her belief — as of course it would — then she would immediately perceive a great potential danger to her child in the smallest threat. [...]

[...] When you sense threat or danger for which the body can find no biological correlation, even as through cellular communication it scans the environment physically, then it must rely upon your assessment and react to danger conditions. The body will, therefore, react to imagined dangers to some degree, as well as to those that are biologically pertinent. [...]

[...] A cat does not anticipate danger from a penned dog four blocks away, however, nor bother wondering what would happen if that dog were to escape and find the cat’s cozy yard.

He basically good, but hidden aggressions a danger. [...]

(“In what way are these aggressions a danger?”)

He was certainly encouraged, and by his mother, to pursue the ways of inward intellectual freedoms, up to a point; but he was early inculcated with the expectation that the outside world meant danger at the least, and tragedy more probably.

I would like to add a note concerning the importance and dangers of

[...] You are in no danger of a severe depression of any kind. [...]

An expectation of danger will indeed create danger. [...]

If you became wealthy, you would then be in danger of losing your ability, since in your realm of expectation ability of this nature and wealth do not exist simultaneously. [...]

[...] His framework of personality is now so bound to this nonexistent truth that it would be dangerous for me to tamper with it.

[...] Ego considers them as invalid and dangerous to its own supremacy. [...] The more rigid an ego is, the more danger there is that the individual will have difficulties in all kinds of adjustments.

There is always the danger in such discussions that effects which are studied separately will appear to be separate in essence. [...]

[...] The danger does exist. [...]

The ego structure had been in danger for some time previous. [...]

[...] To shunt it aside is highly dangerous. [...]

[...] Our questions would also apply to living in any dangerous environment on the planet, of course.

(9:55.) Some people looked, and are looking, for some authority — any authority — to make their decisions for them, for the world seems increasingly dangerous, and they, because of their beliefs, feel increasingly powerless. [...]

[...] Jane and I believe that eventually this worst accident yet will be seen as a most fortunate occurrence, emphasizing — indeed, as it already has — the great dangers inherent in the growing worldwide emphasis upon nuclear power at this time. [...]

[...] With drugs, there are some dangers. [...]

[...] There is little danger involved, as a rule. [...]

[...] Even discounting for the present the more tricky drugs, drugs with many side effects, quite severe sometimes, there was a drug less dangerous. [...] (Persantine.) The more dangerous ones, for God’s sake, turned down the body’s own defense mechanisms and immunity, an effect that really seemed absolutely senseless to me. [...]

[...] Explained the dangers of vasculitis to Jane—possible damage to internal organs—start treatment before that happens, if necessary. [...]

Instead, previous to psychology’s entrance, before psychology mapped the acceptable or forbidden, the dangerous or safe compartments of the self, man used the word “soul” to include his own entire complexity. [...]

[...] Psychological reality, for all of the religious (pause) dangers placed upon it, was anything but a flat-surfaced experience. [...]

Capitalism has its faults, and democracy has its potential dangers, as has any kind of government. [...]

Again, you equate—both of you—the time of rest as somewhat dangerous. [...]

There is no danger, and I will repeat this: There is no danger of dissociation grabbing a hold of him like some black, vague and furry monster, carrying him away to the netherlands of hysteria, schizophrenia, or insanity… I have consistently advised contacts with the world at large, and I have advised you both to use your abilities to meet outside challenges. [...]

[...] Actually his intentions were of the best, and I suppose that I now must feel obligated—and I do—to go into the matter of mental and emotional stability, and any dangers to such stability that might be involved here.

As far as Ruburt is concerned, there is no such danger. [...]

You, Joseph, and Ruburt, are basically well-balanced, and sensible as well as intuitional, and you are in absolutely no danger at all.

[...] They will concentrate upon all of the dangers present in society in their own country, or in other portions of the world, until their own frightened overall concern for safety seems to be a quite natural, rational response to conditions over which they have no control.

[...] In many such cases, however, the people so worried about the occurrence of danger from the outside world are instead concerned about the nature of their own energy, and afraid that it might destroy them.

[...] Had there been considerable danger for example, that danger would have overridden other circumstances in your case. [...]

[...] He outlined, as you know, some of the dangers in undisciplined dabbling with the subconscious, and I have also hinted that certainly some could, and did, exist, which is why we have progressed slowly and surely, in a disciplined manner.

There is no danger of either so-called (in quotes) “unhealthy or evil or demon, or uncontrolled spirits,” (end of quote), finding access to the door in the subconscious which Ruburt has opened. [...]

[...] The closed and dangerous subconscious is that one which is closed both to inner depths of inspiration arising from the inner self, and also to outer doors of expression.

[...] These ideas usually ride along with feelings that power is desirable but dangerous. [...]