“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Somehow the conversation turned to the lives Jane and I had led in Denmark. [...]

[...] The conversation led to some of the voyages the ship made. [...]

[...] And we have been conversing with people of some note—I was on my good manners. [...]

Now if I were coming here for fun, I would indeed enjoy smiles and light and conversation. [...]

A conversation, the conversation, turns to statistics. [...]

[...] A conversation having to do with history, particularly eighteenth- century England.

Illness as a Way of Focus — an Organizer of Experience Conversion, love, etc., as alternate organizers.

[...] I took notes on our conversation about it that Sunday night. [...]

[...] Strong personal “conversions” are often effected from this level. [...]

[...] There is an unending conversation going on throughout the universe, and a most meaningful one. [...]

[...] I made no effort to record the conversation.)

[...] And I have always enjoyed conversation, which is the liveliest of all arts. [...] I did not mean that conversation was on an equal par with painting.

[...] Jane is right in supposing that I prefer conversation, even though I admit this usually amounts to a monologue. [...]

[...] We ended up in a rather acrimonious conversation in which I hoped I’d alienated him enough so he’d not bother my wife or me.

[...] I’m quite aware of the contradictions in our own behavior, too, as I told Jane after the half-hour conversation was over: We put our work out into the arena where it’s available to anyone, and hope they’ll pay attention to it. [...]

Sue Watkins, who described Jane’s ESP class so well in her two-volume Conversations with Seth, recently began doing research for Conversations with Jane Roberts: A Multidimensional Memoir.

[...] Jane, he said, could use the practice of switching focus; and we did have the effect of a conversation among five people instead of four. [...]

[...] The conversation revolved around our use of slang, and our speculations as to the source of Seth’s knowledge.)

—No one has to watch their conversation with me. [...]

[...] She agreed that it should work, especially if she was capable, as Seth, of carrying on a conversation with three other people, almost simultaneously.

[...] Do you want to have a pleasant evening of conversation, or do you want to go to bed?

(Before the session tonight Jane and I discovered during our conversation that each of us had toyed with the idea of asking Seth to answer the letter. [...]

There is a heat conversion. [...]

Some of the results mentioned earlier will come from conversations the Seagull has with people in California, who ask him about us. [...]

[...] The session did not particularly grow out of the evening’s conversation; perhaps more so from a short discussion Jane and I held when we were alone at last.

1. An obvious example here is the conversion of the Apostle Paul (Saul of Tarsus) on the road to Damascus around A.D. 36, a few years after the “death” of Jesus.

[...] You go through periods, of course, where you utilize Framework 2 more proficiently than you do at other times, but reminding yourselves in conversation of Framework 2’s existence and importance can be an invaluable assistance. [...]

[...] You should both be more spontaneous (whispering) with loving touches and conversations, and see even your difficulties existing in rich environments of being, in which you are not isolated. [...]

[...] In a conversation—now listen to me—In a conversation that you now decide sounds boring when you enter it, you can catch yourself thinking: “This is boring. [...]

[...] You bring it into the conversation. [...]

[...] Observe yourself—in conversation. [...]

[...] You erect barriers like walls—so that someone wanting to communicate with you cannot get through, cannot find a “hole” in your conversation to reach you. [...]

Then in here I enter a conversation with another girl about Louis Untermeyer. [...]

[...] That is why your conversation earlier was advantageous, because you do not often verbalize your feelings.

Some people may seem completely normal in behavior unless certain subjects are brought up in the course of a conversation, or unless some stimulus in the environment arouses them.

[...] Professional matters were also involved, so their conversation lasted until 10:47 p.m. We didn’t go back to the session. [...]