“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The spacious present does not contradict the existence of a future as you conceive it. [...]

[...] Disbelievers say that neurological evidence contradicts this theory; that from the neurological standpoint the events in our lives and within our bodies depend upon interpretation by the brain, that we can know nothing directly, but only experience transmitted through — and so “colored” by — the central nervous system. [...]

[...] Seth hasn’t said so yet, but I think such contradictions play an important negative role in present world conditions. [...]

[...] At the same time, we take note of the latest efforts of biological researchers to explain how, millions of years ago, a primitive DNA molecule could begin to manufacture the protein upon which life “rides,” and thus get around the contradiction posed in Note 8: What made the protein that sustains the processes of life, before that life was present to make the protein? [...]

It is only when you do not carry through in either that there appears to be contradiction. [...]

(9:00.) As Ruburt himself often mentioned in his own book, The God of Jane, you should never accept as fact a theory that contradicts (underlined) your own experience. [...]

[...] It may, here, sound like a contradiction; but to remain an identity, an identity must completely renew itself, and each renewal is indeed a termination. [...]

3. At first, as I typed this session from my notes a couple of days later, I thought that Seth had contradicted himself here, for earlier in the session he’d stated that “the other creatures of the earth actually awakened before man did, and relatively speaking, their dream bodies formed themselves into physical ones before man’s did.” [...]

He began to creatively consider what he would do, and then out of habit projected, at times, his present circumstances, so that they seemed to contradict his hopes. [...]

Another point: regardless of any seeming contradictions, the beneficial aspects of any particular creative activity far outweigh any disadvantages. [...]

[...] There is no contradiction, no exception. [...]

[...] Any misconceptions, contradictions, seeming dilemmas, are resolved, for now you are not going against your own nature but with it, and from Framework 2 you draw out the greatest natural potentials that are uniquely yours.

[...] To some extent Ruburt is in a quandary, for the idea of gaining weight seems to contradict other deeply-buried feelings.

3. Nor was I quick enough to ask Seth if the material Jane delivered for him tonight constituted any kind of contradiction with that of the 689th session; for in that session he discussed man-animal and animal-man as existing within the Tertiary Period. [...]

[...] According to Seth’s suggested use of the point of power, and his late deleted material, one isn’t supposed to dwell on the past, but go forward from the present—two major blocks of material, I told Jane this evening, that at first glance seem to contradict each other. [...]

This would seem contrary to your known laws, yet no one has looked into the reasons for this seeming contradiction. [...]

[...] There is no contradiction between the two alternatives you gave me. [...]

These sentences should now clear up that seeming contradiction between relaxation and doing that he has felt for so long. [...]

[...] Within yourselves you understand the meaning of the word joy, then you will find no contradiction. [...]

Again physically speaking, you will find nothing to contradict these assumptions, since physically to you they are all that you can experience or perceive. [...]

[...] This is why many psychic or subjective experiences seem to contradict physical laws. [...]

[...] As Seth told us in a number of ways (and to some extent I’m certainly paraphrasing him here), “Never accept a theory that contradicts your own experience.” [...]

[...] (“Yes, I’m convinced that you have reached Jane, just as I have.”) I’m not contradicting myself when I note that perhaps — and I’ve suspected for a long time that ultimately this is correct — it is true that on some far levels of consciousness and communication that we do not (or even cannot) understand at this “time,” each person who is so inclined to do so has at least touched a Jane who responded clearly enough. [...]

[...] Does Jane contradict herself in them? [...]

[...] Again, I am aware of the contradiction that seems to be presented to your minds. [...]

[...] After the session I began to wonder if Seth hadn’t contradicted himself by saying there could be an end result of something infinite. [...]