“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] You therefore identified with elements, characteristics, and traditions that seemed to suit you best.

[...] When I say as I have that the overall entity [or whole self] is neither male or female, and yet refer to [some] entities by definitely male names such as ‘Ruburt’ and ‘Joseph’ [as Seth calls me], I merely mean that in the overall essence, the [given] entity identifies itself more with the so-called male characteristics than with the female.”

[...] Both of you went too far in opposite directions, as is characteristic of your own natures: you are sometimes inclined, and underline sometimes, to be overly pessimistic; and Ruburt is sometimes inclined to be not overly optimistic but overly docile, as far as his connections with the outside world are concerned.

Creativity is an emotional and psychic characteristic. [...]

[...] In the beginnings within your universe psychic characteristics grouped into units of attraction, so that mental enclosures were formed that could be compared to the smallest physical particle.

[...] (To me, humorously.) The familiar human component is necessary, and it is by my characteristics that you know me, but the entity is an ancient one, and we are far more concerned with other things than your position at your bank.

[...] Certain personality characteristics are exaggerated quite purposefully by the creative personality, to act as a lens to intensify experience.

[...] He even has many of the characteristics of the other self, though these of course are latent. [...]

[...] However the nature of such experiences is strongly dependent upon the particular emotional system that is characteristic of any given personality.

“What happened was a very momentary merging of personality characteristics on deeper than conscious levels,” Seth said. [...]

Now, of course they think of books as products, so it seems to you that they should think in terms of the best products, in the same way that you might think of a best painting—but when you think that way, you are still projecting artistic characteristics where they do not fit. [...]

[...] The members of each “species” — and you had better put that in quotes — of consciousness relate to physical experience in their characteristic ways, even viewing time, space, and action differently. [...]

[...] While I used that explanation as a handy whipping boy at times, I didn’t really believe that either: my subconscious was getting enough expression in my short stories and poetry—and without adopting other personality characteristics. [...]

[...] The areas it chooses to reject are determined by characteristics that are unique to the particular ego.

[...] This is a characteristic of my own. [...]

[...] You make no effort to cultivate the kind of characteristics involved. [...]

[...] The relationship would be very good, then, but some old characteristic responses of ours would occur now and then, and frighten him. [...]

[...] Freedom from time and place, the wider kind of communication, the great mobility of consciousness — all of these experiences under dreaming conditions are characteristic of the basic nature of reality — whereas your waking experience provides limitations that are indicators of certain conditions only. [...]

[...] You will not melt into some great golden bliss in which your characteristics will disappear. [...]

You have each your own characteristic ways of advancement. [...]

[...] There is simply a point that you recognize as having the characteristics that you have arbitrarily ascribed to life, or living conditions. [...]

[...] To you they may seem to have been limited, yet they combined animal and human characteristics beautifully, and they used tools quite well. [...]

[...] The mind can ask too many questions to be satisfied with mechanistic explanations, and nurturing that characteristic of dissatisfaction alone may be one of the most valuable contributions the Seth material can make.