2 results for (book:ur2 AND session:732 AND stemmed:affili)

► UR2 Appendix 25: (For Session 732) counterparts Norma Herriman Peter Granger
¶6

(I suppose that one can find all sorts of variations within counterpart situations, all sorts of reasons for such affiliations, so I can merely hint at a few here as they rise out of the class framework or orbit around it:

¶10

(I found it very interesting to consider my class counterparts with that general designation of them in mind. Peter and I had rather idly speculated that because of our common interests we could have reincarnational ties.2 Seth’s naming Norma as being psychically affiliated with me was unexpected, however. Norma is a new member of class. She’s from out of town, and I hardly know her [she’s also so quiet]; but even so, I could see how it was possible that she could be embarked upon her own series of lifetime challenges while expressing certain qualities of the entity, or whole self from, which we both emerged. Some of her characteristics, which I’ve just begun to glimpse, complement some of mine; others are opposing. And Norma, of course, would turn all of this around and examine it from her own very independent viewpoint.

► UR2 Section 6: Session 732 January 22, 1975 counterparts Peter family Henry Ben
¶21

[...] This does not mean that if you become consciously aware of such affiliations you must then feel it your responsibility to form a kind of culture of counterparts, or to try and affect other people’s lives by reminding them of your relationship. [...]

¶36

[...] You have inner affiliations. [...]

¶39

[...] During break Jane came through with additional psychic affiliations among her students, but it isn’t necessary to discuss them here. [...]